well the very idea of emulating tubes in the digital domain makes me laugh (hahahah). its just a paradaox, because the two exist in two different realms. not saying either one is better (and ofcouse it is, if only just because one is trying to be like the other), but telling people there is no difference is pure insanity. hows that for a marketing strategy eh
which leads me to the thought - why arent there any hardware emulations of software products? ok just joking.
hardware vs vsti
-
forky forkerson
- mnml newbie
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:39 am
- Location: Denton, Tx
d-rokc wrote:plaster i would seriously think before calling the purchase of a hardware sampler 'silly'. heres a few reasons why:
i just dropped that and stayed alive since i was thinking logic.
what do you mean when you say that soft samplers can sample?
i'm like all ???
Drop the idea of becoming someone else, because you are already a masterpiece.
d-rokc wrote:i didnt say soft samplers can sample.
on the contrary - i said they DONT CAN. uuhh, CAN NOT. yeh. what do i mean? c'mon now, i doubt that you dont know what 'sampling' means
forgot to add an accent and a t
i know what sampling means, that's why i'm asking.
Drop the idea of becoming someone else, because you are already a masterpiece.
sorry,what is the "tube sound"?
and about the whole debate,I don't understand this "fun" theory.
I agree hardwares sound more alive and working with them is a real
joy rather than staring to monitor for hours,but if you
get the sound you want from a software,then whats wrong,cause thats the real "fun"
and about the whole debate,I don't understand this "fun" theory.
I agree hardwares sound more alive and working with them is a real
joy rather than staring to monitor for hours,but if you
get the sound you want from a software,then whats wrong,cause thats the real "fun"