apologies to everyone else that has to read this... but have gone major geeky on this..... you have been warned.
Salomo wrote:
You obviously don't know your facts either, for one we don't descend from the Neanderthals (humans and neanderthals have lived in the same time, even fought with each other, making it impossible of course they are our ancestors) .
yep you're right.. we're not necessarily direct descendants of neanderthals just part of the same species... i just said it to illustrate the point that before civilisation we were doing stuff... its not just one day there was civilisation brought to us by aliens... our civilisation came about through thousands of years of progress.... on a side note there is some evidence that there were homo sapien/neanderthal inter breeding, so you might be a fraction neanderthal (which could explain you're belief in alien pyramid builders
)
Salomo wrote:
The earth moves? .. so ? what else is new. does not change anything about the gravitational pull at their relation in positioning (not in a few thousand years at least)....
correct.. the earth's movement doesn't effect the movement of far away stars (although earth will effect the movement of our own sun ever so slightly)... that said, the earth's movement changes the perspective of the stars for observers on earth.
so the pyramids alignment with the pole star isn't what they would have been aligned with when the pyramids were built all those thousands of years ago. This is due to
axial prescession which is makes the earth wobble when the earth spins on its axis.. This causes the star's locations in the sky to move, approximately it takes 26,000 years for it to do a full wobble cycle. so the
pole star that we know today wouldn't have marked out true north back then.. Add to this the giza pyramids aren't fully mirroring orions belt in relation to the milky way as it stands.. the theory is that the nile is the milky way and the 3 pyramids represents orion's belt. however when looking at the pyramids this isn't fully accurate... its only when the stars are shifted due to prescession that everything is mirrored correctly.
Salomo wrote:ridiculous what you say "not aligned anymore because earth moves", why the hell do you think the theory is there when we're no longer aligned? wouldnt make much sense would it
I hope that made more sense for you....
Also this precession effect also goes a long way to explaining how they built the pyramids inline with true north. some
bird at cambridge reckons that they used two stars that circled the pole as polaris back then wasn't the pole star. so what the egyptians would have seen through their careful observations were all the stars moving through the night sky giving the illusion that they circled this invisible polar point, then using two stars close to the pole as a reference. when these stars aligned vertically to the observer, they could have used a plumb line to get that alignment and plot where true north is... then its just a case of building the damn thing. so no aliens, just some amazing ingenuity by the egyptians.
Salomo wrote:Many of these stars have planets in orbit, and a zone suitable for supporting life due to their ideal balance of exposure to the star, just as we do together with mars.
like i said before.. it's not just your distance from the sun.. there are so many different factors to include.. why is mars baron compared to the earth if its in the right location? it used to have an atmosphere and rivers... but the fact it was far smaller than earth meant its molton core stopped or froze, breaking down the magnetic field that protected it from the solar winds of the sun which in turn stripped the planet bare... in addition to the celestrial attributes for supporting any kind of life, to support intelligent life is even harder. humans came in to existence as the result of a careful string of events from the extinction of the dinosaurs to the ice age. which cleared an evolutionary path for humans to evolve... its all these little things that need to happen...for all the universes out there, for all the planets, stars... so much has to be right at the same time....
Salomo wrote:the human kind is ok, but the look on science might actually be quite narrow-minded in the big picture, slowly the quantum mechanics finds it's place in the present-day science to flourish and expand
I think its more a case at looking at things with a rational mind, a scientific mind, an analytical mind... rather than jumping to the first excitable wild theory... most things normally have a simple explanation with rationale behind it....
Salomo wrote:we like to show off useless technology as deep knowledge, giving us megalomanic characteristics.
your right... the wheel pretty fucking useless.. sewage systems what a waste of time... harnessing electricty, don't know why we bothered. vaccinations, who the hell needs them? anti biotics- only for megalomaniacs...