steevio wrote:but utility modules are the most important part of my set-up.

this is the same for me in my software work flow. i use ableton's velocity plugin like crazy and i'm always shocked when people say they've never touched it.

i made an attempt at putting together a system that may be a little more interesting than the foundation. thoughts and suggestions and pointing out mistakes appreciated. doepfer: a-100p6 with psu2 (1200ma) rear mounted power switch (black) (a little room to grow) Doepfer: A-110 Standard VCO Pittsbur...

i'm really into midi delay at the moment which i am assuming is similar to what you are describing. yeah its very similar, but not exactly the same, and i'd find it difficult to explain why its different in the same way as i find it hard to explain the difference between modular and other forms of ...

tone-def wrote:the pittsburgh foundation would be better if it came in a half empty 6U case.

oblioblioblio wrote:it's going to make you regret buying it instead of a bigger system.

i assumed the next step after buying it or the doepfer mini system would be to buy an empty case to start filling with modules.

i'm strongly considering the pittsburgh modular foundation as a starting point. any thoughts?

like simple building blocks all interacting. again, this is much like how i approach my current work. well guys i guess the answer is becoming more and more obvious to me. i'm sure i'll be back to post questions and updates regarding my modular progress. i'm hitting all the stickies on muff wiggler...

i dont use delays with my modular, delays sound a bit too obvious to me, ive been using them so long now i'm bored with them. i use trigger delays instead, so instead of delaying audio, i delay the sequences and triggers, that way you can have your delays do anything you want instead of just repeat...

the first thing that is confusing to me is what seems to be a very low number of reverb and delay modules. is there a reason for this or am i simply not finding them?