Pioneer DJM 800 vs. A+H Xone 92

- ask away
Post Reply
User avatar
digitalbunny
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:05 pm
Location: Hobart, Australia

Post by digitalbunny »

Spot on
I got the MkII one... which you can hear the EQ in.

I googled the jumper setting thing, it seems it only relates to EQ being cued... not the filter as well.
uebl
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:54 pm
Location: .de

Post by uebl »

filters can't be cue'd with the x:62 and the x:92 aswell
User avatar
tone-def
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 3822
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Hertfordshire

Post by tone-def »

I've only every used the mk2. I actully prefer the EQ cue thing i was talking about the the A&H. I wish all mixers were made like this.
nihad
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:52 am

Post by nihad »

digitalbunny wrote:There are 2 different versions of the xone 62... you can tell the difference by the pots and cross fader. Obviously the earlier version didn't have the EQ routed to the cue.

Nihad - do tell us more about this jumper for the cue

i remember e-mailing a&h about it some years ago, there is simply a jumper that you switch if you want pre or post fader cue ... i think it's also possible to alter even more stuff this way, as it is possible on the xone:92, where you can bypass the phono pres (for additional line inputs), change midi channel, etc ...

didn't know about the 64 mk1 and mk2, i've only seen mk2 version judging from the pictures above ..
Post Reply