Ok, I'm gonna answer all in one...
steevio wrote:but it's also cool to be able to live from what you were designed for.
Well my friend unfortunetly in this world artists gotta have more talents than just making music. Because there's already a lot of people who CAN make music.
steevio wrote:To say that its impossible to make a living from music is naive, just ask Richie Hawtin.
The point is not about whether you can make or not a living from music, the point is that if your purpose is making a living from record selling you are also being part of the music industry "middlemen"
steevio wrote:The problem is that only a few people make alot of money instead of it being shared out equally, and that is because of the bullshit music business !!
It's the same you are trying to do, just think about it and realize. In a smaller scale but it's the same.
For the time that the music remains as a business there will always be that problem.
steevio wrote:With the internet we have the chance to change all that, we have the chance to be payed directly for our efforts, by cutting out all the middlemen.
Ohh really? How are you going to change it? Doing the same?
There's always going to be middlemen when you go through a process of creating and selling a product.
dsat wrote:isabella
pls don't just take my words out of context
it's a bit insulting...
I am sorry for that, it's not my purpose to offend you or insult you
dsat wrote:if you go back to what i've written, you'll find that i said that music shouldn't be free unless it's for promotional purposes...
What's the difference between a promotional copy of a record and a sold record? MONEY, but the promotion is the same. Probably more with a promo copy or a free copy.
With internet artists can get to a lot of people they couldn't even imagine before with regular distribution. Now someone from (let's say) singapore can listen to their tracks, when before it was not possible. Isn't that a reward?
dsat wrote:i do believe that music has become too expensive and this pisses of a lot of people, i just wonder if people would buy more music if sales prices would drop or if they would simply find some other excuse to download for free
People don't need to buy records. It's old fashioned, not environment friendly and it makes no sense
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
That's what the artists and the music industry have to realize. Things change.
I don't want to have a very expensive big media (example: vinyl or cd) that contains very little music when I can have small media (example: hard drive, digital player) containing a lot of music cheaper or for free.
An artist is creating music in a computer, why in the world would you want to go through all that process of creating a product people don't need and it's completely obsolete?
To create and sell unneeded necesities like big companies do?
Do you want to be part of that huge consume process with art? I wouldn't want to...
BTW: Just because people buy a release on vinyl doesn't mean it's a good product or music, it's just fast buying (consuming) or marketing strategy.
Stupid example, I know, but Jennifer lopez has sold millions of records and that doesn't make the music GOOD.
steevio wrote:i realise now after two weeks of posting on my first ever forum, that i have to make myself more clear. Maybe i should stick to making music.
It happens to me a lot, so don't even bother for the missunderstanding
![:wink:](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f609.svg)
It happens very often, specially on written discussions.
And please
don't take my comments personal.
We are all trying to have a nice discussion here and I am not pointing at anyone, I am pointing at ways of thinking. Ideas, not people.
PS: I am not on fire, mad or against anyone.