anyway, when i get the cash needed i'm definitely buying a mixer too, if only for the looks of it
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
no seriously mate, i'm not sure what you mean.s.k. wrote:well i think there's no need to explain it exactly to you, i'm sure you know what i mean.. (@steevio)
anyway, when i get the cash needed i'm definitely buying a mixer too, if only for the looks of itwho cares how it sounds...
absolutely !steevio wrote: if anyone here has only ever worked ITB then you cannot know the power of these techniques
bloody sunday...steevio wrote:no seriously mate, i'm not sure what you mean.s.k. wrote:well i think there's no need to explain it exactly to you, i'm sure you know what i mean.. (@steevio)
anyway, when i get the cash needed i'm definitely buying a mixer too, if only for the looks of itwho cares how it sounds...
but bro, analogue clipping was around before digital was even heard of.s.k. wrote: i mean it sounds paradoxal to me because 'clipping' is supposed to be a digital operation - when the convertor cannot handle the amplitude it truncates the wave in the simplest ever way - to a flat line.