I changed the topics per page from 50 to 100. you like..?

Post by **John Clees** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:54 am

Narcisse2 wrote:I personally dont like it. but meh whatever. i'll be able to sleep

Im fully aware people resist and hate change....

but what's NOT to like about seeing more - just wanted to hear your perspective more specifically..

jaco · Post by **jaco** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:19 am

john clees wrote:
jaco wrote:75....because i don't like extremism...
that would be more like 500 - then we could have 10 - 20 stickies..lol

well then i would say 225, and so on..

no ok, im good also with 100, there is a lot of stuff coming out these days and you might lose something just because is on the second page...

dav.id · Post by **dav.id** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:58 am

If yes 'cause i like it informative
If no, 'cause it will be bigger, anonyme and non focus

Post by **-ix** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:07 am

What was wrong with 50?

Papillon · Post by **Papillon** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:15 am

lol, john is bored.

Please include an option in the menu that allows me to chose the subforums that I want to be informed about when there are new posts. Wonder why this hasnt been implemented ages ago.

patrick bateman · Post by **patrick bateman** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:15 am

-ix wrote:What was wrong with 50?

+1

I think 100 is too much, easier to overlook 50 threads than 100 IMO.

bshosa · Post by **bshosa** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:18 pm

patrick bateman wrote:
-ix wrote:What was wrong with 50?
+1

I think 100 is too much, easier to overlook 50 threads than 100 IMO.

+1

fugazi · Post by **fugazi** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:03 pm

bshosa wrote:
patrick bateman wrote:
-ix wrote:What was wrong with 50?
+1

I think 100 is too much, easier to overlook 50 threads than 100 IMO.
+1

+2

I changed the topics per page from 50 to 100. you like..?

I changed the tops per page from 50 to 100. you like..?