XP Home or XP Professional for audio tasks ?

- ask away
Post Reply
User avatar
mo's taverne
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Institutsviertel

XP Home or XP Professional for audio tasks ?

Post by mo's taverne »

After getting hard attacked by some Trojan Virus, i need to setup my whole system from scratch. I've been running Win XP Home for some years on my Laptop without any problems, but i'm evaluating the pro and con's of both systems at the moment. As far as i know, XP Pro has better networking and security options but is there any difference in general performance (DAW wise) ? I'm using my laptop mainly for audio tasks and partly for internet and uni work. So, any of you have an adwise or have experienced both systems ?
...:.::.:::.:.....::....:...::...::.::::....::...:....

http://biloba.twoday.net/
Matt du Jardin
mnml newbie
mnml newbie
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 12:40 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Matt du Jardin »

No difference at all. It's still the same O/S but with a few registry keys to enable the network features. Stay clear of Vista though, that cripples your system nicely. :?
Robot Criminal
mnml moderator
mnml moderator
Posts: 2561
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Est0n14

Post by Robot Criminal »

in my opinion, home is impossible to use. Its like disabled or something...
Image we are all atomic and subatomic particles and we are all wireless...
kahl_s
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 702
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:24 pm

Post by kahl_s »

dubble core cpu is only supported by xp professional, right?
User avatar
gubenhinden
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 737
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:07 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Post by gubenhinden »

xp home also supports dual core.
the only difference, as already said by Matt, is the limitation of your network-settings.

if your are using a privat network at home with an enabled dhcp server you wont have any probs with the home edition.
User avatar
mo's taverne
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Institutsviertel

Post by mo's taverne »

yeah, i wish there is a double core inside my laptop :wink: .

Thanks for your answers so far. I asked for that on the ableton forum too, and there was the same answers - no difference performance wise. After having serious trouble with the reinstall (xp setup asked for a file on the cd which seems to be not readable) i made it with an old, original xp pro cd. I'm running now two seperate xp pro os's - one for audio work and one for i-net / uni work. Seems fine to me, cause i got a gain of ~4% cpu power in ableton . In addition to that i'm feeling safe that if i ever got a virus again (the i-net os is protected like hell), it will only damage my non-audio os.
...:.::.:::.:.....::....:...::...::.::::....::...:....

http://biloba.twoday.net/
User avatar
Android
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 415
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 7:05 am

Post by Android »

is an Apple out of the question ?

XP is seriously like 6/7 years old at this point

thats like 18 in computer years

I know some folks still use Amiga / C64's
but those at least have the retro cool factor...


:roll:
User avatar
tone-def
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 3822
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Hertfordshire

Post by tone-def »

[quote="Android"]

I know some folks still use Amiga / C64's
but those at least have the retro cool factor...


:roll:[/quote]

But those people use their computers in different ways and mostly use hardware synths, drum machines and samplers.

OSX is so much better
Post Reply