The True American Peacetime Civil Flag[?]!

- open
Post Reply
User avatar
John Clees
mnml admn
mnml admn
Posts: 7711
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:21 am
Location: walk the e[art]h : detroit-metro.
Contact:

The True American Peacetime Civil Flag[?]!

Post by John Clees »

US Civil Peacetime Flag [?]!

Image


The True American Peacetime Civil Flag!
Image


The True American Peacetime Civil Flag!
Image
This flag only flew in America
during the 3 years America
was not at war with anyone!



U.S. Military Flag
Image
U.S. Military flag
If you fly this flag in front of your home,
You are signifying your home as a military
installation! You are allowing occupation!


(s): https://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2018/11 ... -flag.html
User avatar
John Clees
mnml admn
mnml admn
Posts: 7711
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:21 am
Location: walk the e[art]h : detroit-metro.
Contact:

Re: The True American Peacetime Civil Flag!

Post by John Clees »

http://www.loeser.us/flags/american_note_2.html

Interesting, however, the flag [sold below] looked edited too. lulz

EDIT: WINGS DOWN = VADICAN OWNED CORPORATION

:-flower
Attachments
Custom service flag.JPG
Custom service flag.JPG (109.46 KiB) Viewed 744 times
User avatar
John Clees
mnml admn
mnml admn
Posts: 7711
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:21 am
Location: walk the e[art]h : detroit-metro.
Contact:

Re: The True American Peacetime Civil Flag!

Post by John Clees »

(s) https://national-assembly.net/handbook/ ... -peacetime

I would say, each source/site that tries to disprove it, also supports it with a stamp, or flies UNDER the military one...
I think in that reference it may have been a count setting, which was where they only were seen for some time, apparently.

Furthermore, I think both are true. The initial flag was true, and was attempted to be completely discredited, all the while the new version was also true, and also not it's original intent. Case solved. :lol:

Therefore, even attempting to discredit, may hold true
- [This flag only flew in America during the 3 years, America was not at war with anyone!] -
which would explain WHY it was covered up, and layered, which could explain where it has gone today, what a [new] pretend meaning is, as it's had multiple adjustments, what it means at it's core, to whom these pretend, contracts are now, today, supposedly rule? Or one could say, pretending to rule, due to fraud, and are certainly losing their muster, awful quickly.
:lol:


Also, I never knew this before; funny thing this CHANGE to COURT as the term being used.

Not only had common law, common Wo/man, BUT common also Common courts

Changing things from [Custom-house] to [Court]

- Ummmmmmmm

Interesting stuff.

:-flower
Attachments
military image - up -.JPG
military image - up -.JPG (86.06 KiB) Viewed 737 times
Customer House.JPG
Customer House.JPG (316.02 KiB) Viewed 738 times
Post Reply