getting a track finished. (the aforementioned arrangement part then)
I have like so many unfinished tracks which are missing some parts in arrangement or something and I just can't force myself to work with them.
When I'm on about half a track (arranging), I completely lose interest and want to get my ears on some new sounds and stuff.
Damn I would like to hear some advice to overcome this.
which would be the worst part of production for you?
-
- mnml moderator
- Posts: 2561
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:30 pm
- Location: Est0n14
try sticking with it for a while and take your time when you are choosing samples or whatever. also, try to studx classical methods of arrangement it will help you a whole lot. listen to pop or rock it's a good way to learn how to do intro's, bridges and choruses.
Drop the idea of becoming someone else, because you are already a masterpiece.
ok now seriously,
i usually chain whichever one of my two drum machines to my sampler, bust some quick beats, and then quickly while the rough feeling of the groove is still there - record it in logic. thats right, always keep the rec. button armed. with this done, i pretty much got the basics of the track, its spine. highest level of pre-roduction <----- the trouble is, thats the part i like
then comes the part i dont like. i run outa brown buds and its time to work (understand - do arrangement and further sequencing). its not that i hate it, but seems the most time-consuming. imo its better to be done quickly, cuz thats when the mixing part comes, and god knows thats sweet
i usually chain whichever one of my two drum machines to my sampler, bust some quick beats, and then quickly while the rough feeling of the groove is still there - record it in logic. thats right, always keep the rec. button armed. with this done, i pretty much got the basics of the track, its spine. highest level of pre-roduction <----- the trouble is, thats the part i like
then comes the part i dont like. i run outa brown buds and its time to work (understand - do arrangement and further sequencing). its not that i hate it, but seems the most time-consuming. imo its better to be done quickly, cuz thats when the mixing part comes, and god knows thats sweet
rock beyond believe
-
- mnml maxi
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 5:00 am
If you're having a problem arranging a track and keeping it interesting, its either because A) You don't have enough sh!t going on to make it progress as a story or B) You have too many parts that don't really click together smoothly in 5-8 minutes. The hardest part for me (and I wouldn't say I hate it), is coming up with the perfect bassline and groove.
-
- mnml maxi
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 5:00 am
Why is it such a pain in the ass? Just do subtle changes in panning randomly to free up some room and make the track breathe. A stereo imager does the job real quickly as well. If you pan things too much it sounds like sh!t.plaster wrote: i just love mixing...it's so fun.
oh, just remembered one more thing... paning...it's a pain in the ass.
-
- mnml mmbr
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 2:22 pm
- Location: Rotterdam
getting the basses(drums and synth) just right.
making tracks with enough changes, yet remaining focused on a theme.
and all the tedious edits.
arranging improperly can ruin a good idea too.
oh, and trying not to make tracks too long.
and every time i hear a great track, i want to punch myself in the face, for not being better!
making tracks with enough changes, yet remaining focused on a theme.
and all the tedious edits.
arranging improperly can ruin a good idea too.
oh, and trying not to make tracks too long.
and every time i hear a great track, i want to punch myself in the face, for not being better!
bawww..........beep-beep