[M_nus 64] Marc Houle - Sixty Four
- antonio_pt
- mnml maxi
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 2:06 pm
- Location: London
-
- mnml maxi
- Posts: 956
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:24 pm
- Location: Aveiro, Portugal
- Contact:
-
- mnml maxi
- Posts: 2556
- Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:38 am
- Contact:
You lost me...
Deathray, I can agree with the comments, that's just... weird, but so are some Frankie releases for example.
But I really don't see what's so horribly wrong with Sands and Jouster. The second one reminds me of DS/Harry Axt his style (hell it could be his imo), yet I don't see such negative comments about those releases?
Someone enlighten me!
Deathray, I can agree with the comments, that's just... weird, but so are some Frankie releases for example.
But I really don't see what's so horribly wrong with Sands and Jouster. The second one reminds me of DS/Harry Axt his style (hell it could be his imo), yet I don't see such negative comments about those releases?
Someone enlighten me!
Last edited by tettezak on Thu Aug 07, 2008 9:14 am, edited 4 times in total.
i think most people expect better from mr. houle, specially when they know he's released tracks as the ones on (i.e.) "restore". not that one always should compare new material with older releases etc, because that will be wrong (imo), but for me this release is unexplainable hehetettezak wrote:You lost me...
Deathray, I can agree with the comments, that's just... weird, but so are some Frankie releases for example.
But I really don't see what's so horribly wrong with Sands and Jouster. The second one reminds me of DS/Harry Axt his style (hell it could be his imo), yet I don't see such negative comments about those releases?
Someone enlighten me!
i listened to each sample for at most five seconds each, and even on such a little time it was easy to decide that it is (for me) a very lousy release..