Mixers

- open
Post Reply
User avatar
Delano
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 533
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Groningen / NL

Post by Delano »

Lex_Osk wrote:
so you're saying that xone92 is better than djm600? :o
:!: :!: :!:
DJM600:

- Cheap ass faders
- Crap sound
- The gains suck
- The EQ suck

and so on...

Xone:92 just love it...

8)
Zergon
mnml newbie
mnml newbie
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: Ljubljana / Slovenia
Contact:

Post by Zergon »

everybody loves djm600 only for the effects... and that's it.
as Delano said - sound is crap and I agree.

92 has way better sound than 600.

although 92 has only filter, it is very sweet and useful.
User avatar
Davlov
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:25 pm
Location: Groningen, The Netherlands

Post by Davlov »

Agree on both of you.. also DJM has bad headroom + filters are crap
Wir machen weiter
User avatar
brianc
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:23 am
Location: cosmos

Post by brianc »

Zergon wrote:everybody loves djm600 only for the effects... and that's it.
as Delano said - sound is crap and I agree.
Actually, I don't love the effects on my 600 at all. I rarely use them, because I think they've really been over-used. I love my 600 mostly because I can't afford another mixer.
User avatar
Coog
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: new york
Contact:

Post by Coog »

brianc wrote:
Zergon wrote:everybody loves djm600 only for the effects... and that's it.
as Delano said - sound is crap and I agree.
Actually, I don't love the effects on my 600 at all. I rarely use them, because I think they've really been over-used. I love my 600 mostly because I can't afford another mixer.
same exact feelings here!
Lex_Osk
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:18 pm

Post by Lex_Osk »

Coog wrote:
brianc wrote:
Zergon wrote:everybody loves djm600 only for the effects... and that's it.
as Delano said - sound is crap and I agree.
Actually, I don't love the effects on my 600 at all. I rarely use them, because I think they've really been over-used. I love my 600 mostly because I can't afford another mixer.
same exact feelings here!
lol,seems that im the only fan of djm600 here :)
its defo not the best shite on the market,but aint complicated,very simple and nice for learners (like myself). i heard that Rodec mixers have the best sound (ill believe in that,they're fckn great) and the effects on djm600 aint nothing special,but can be useful,btw. i think that mnml dj's dont even need them
User avatar
orbnhoj
mnml newbie
mnml newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 11:26 am

Post by orbnhoj »

i was going to buy a djm 600 until i played on my friends xone 62...so i bought a 62.....) the sound quality is better than any other mixer ive played on...the vca filter is to die for...i absolutley love the penny&giles crossfader....and its quality construction is practically bulletproof. maybe i will upgrade to a 92 or 3d but i really cant justify that when i get all i want out of the 62.....P
User avatar
Coog
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 1106
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: new york
Contact:

Post by Coog »

orbnhoj wrote:i was going to buy a djm 600 until i played on my friends xone 62...so i bought a 62.....) the sound quality is better than any other mixer ive played on...the vca filter is to die for...i absolutley love the penny&giles crossfader....and its quality construction is practically bulletproof. maybe i will upgrade to a 92 or 3d but i really cant justify that when i get all i want out of the 62.....P
wish allen & heath had something in the middle of the 32 and 62 62 has too much(channels and price for my needs) and the 32 is cool except for the gains being on the back panel which i find to be silly. the 92 is siick but so is the price tag and i would have to justify all the midi capabilities when i mostly spin records.
Post Reply