DJM600:Lex_Osk wrote:
so you're saying that xone92 is better than djm600?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- Cheap ass faders
- Crap sound
- The gains suck
- The EQ suck
and so on...
Xone:92 just love it...
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
same exact feelings here!brianc wrote:Actually, I don't love the effects on my 600 at all. I rarely use them, because I think they've really been over-used. I love my 600 mostly because I can't afford another mixer.Zergon wrote:everybody loves djm600 only for the effects... and that's it.
as Delano said - sound is crap and I agree.
lol,seems that im the only fan of djm600 hereCoog wrote:same exact feelings here!brianc wrote:Actually, I don't love the effects on my 600 at all. I rarely use them, because I think they've really been over-used. I love my 600 mostly because I can't afford another mixer.Zergon wrote:everybody loves djm600 only for the effects... and that's it.
as Delano said - sound is crap and I agree.
wish allen & heath had something in the middle of the 32 and 62 62 has too much(channels and price for my needs) and the 32 is cool except for the gains being on the back panel which i find to be silly. the 92 is siick but so is the price tag and i would have to justify all the midi capabilities when i mostly spin records.orbnhoj wrote:i was going to buy a djm 600 until i played on my friends xone 62...so i bought a 62.....) the sound quality is better than any other mixer ive played on...the vca filter is to die for...i absolutley love the penny&giles crossfader....and its quality construction is practically bulletproof. maybe i will upgrade to a 92 or 3d but i really cant justify that when i get all i want out of the 62.....P