[redevice001] V/A "Greed Treatment Program"
That's good to know...pheek wrote:Delano wrote:jpls wrote:I probably can't pick out the 256 Kbps one at home over my cheap speakers.Delano wrote:
So, I did a little test. I took a 2 bar loop out of my track on the compilation.
This loop was taken straight from the 24bit wave master. I dithered down
to 16 bits and encoded at 4 different rates: 256, 192, 160 and 128.
I then decoded the mp3s back into a 16 bit wave and put them into one
file in a non-sequential order:
http://www.boomklik.com/test/exp_mp3Encode.wav
If you can point out which one is 256, I will be very impressed.
But in the club over a bad ass sound system you can hear differences in mp3s, maybe it's just a slight difference between 192 and 256 Kbps.
But since filesize isn't an issue anymore, I just like to play the best quality mp3's that I can get...
Actually, some years ago Hawtin did a test in a very known club with a crazy sound system where he played 12", 192kbps, 256kbps and 320kbps mp3 (from his FS)... He asked 5 people to be there and point out if they can identify the source format. He mainly did that to see if it was worth to use FS.
And guess what...
The 5 guys failed, badly. There was 2 sound tech, John Acquaviva and some other qualified guys.
That explains why he plays mp3s ever since.
I was very unsure about the FS quality in clubs.
And since I take it with me to the club, I only spinned the 256Kbps rips.
I`ll keep it in mind, thanks !
No back on topic
Last edited by Delano on Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ramchez wrote:hi all..
thank you all for the nice reactions from our first release.
i hope you are going to abuse them alot on the dancefloor, or on sunday afternoon with a good cup of coffee. enjoy!!!!
Ramses
yeah homie... you should post a bit more on this board!
Drop the idea of becoming someone else, because you are already a masterpiece.
-
thomasjaldemark
- mnml maxi
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:29 pm
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- Contact: