haha ! reading is not your strong side2. Dont repeat "Richie Hawtin" - propaganda like "A DJ improves if he doesnt have to pitch" (you said it in your deleted post)
This complet false , show me the post
I said , by another words by not having to beatmatch you can use many other skills , and make your sets more original full
ok so if the sets get more full and original, the logic must be, that they werent as original and full befor. furthermore i would think "orginal" and "full" are good skills of a DJ. So if this good skills increase through not beatmatching i would think its not false to say the DJ improved or he got better...your sets get more versatile and full
and for me that sounds a lot like, "if you dont have to beatmatch you are a better DJ"
maybe you dont think about the implications of your words much, but i really see no other interpretation here.
my point is, this kind of justification is the problem. and my opinion is
1. you dont get better, i dont know any DJ who is now better or more original than befor
2. i really believe its harder for a dj to improve if he plays full digital, cause he is constantly forced to do some sh!t that nobody wants to hear
but i understand its easier and maybe its more fun to push all this buttons. so i have no problem if you want to do this. but if i hear things like "vinyl should die" coming from a full digital "DJ", that makes me a little bit aggressive.
yeah why is that strange? cause its not so easy? cause it isnt perfect the whole time?i mean 2010 and talking about beatmatch and fade in/out....sorry seems bit strange to me....