PLEASE DO NOT SUPPORT THIS WANNABE!

brosky · Post by **brosky** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:17 am

first , who is this Luciano Pardini????
second , i think a wannabe you just made him popular

4am · Post by **4am** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:35 am

right! every form of advertising (good or bad) is still advertising
by writing this post in capitals you are, against your will, promoting him
i didn't know who about him before

Atheory · Post by **Atheory** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:19 pm

all publicity is good publicity?

its not hollywood guys. i think the "producer" involved would probably prefare not to have this sort of publicity.

K0$+3k · Post by **K0$+3k** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 1:42 pm

brosky wrote:first , who is this Luciano Pardini????

http://www.mnml.nl/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=54275

nice glasses

I think all this action is due to the lobby of this guy,by the people he knew.He will lose honor,but so what?Many ppl find out that there is someone like L.Pardini,and that it is sufficient for him.He get its bowl of steaming porridge,or booking in the local club with few free beers;).
Unnecessary bothering.

Opuswerk · Post by **Opuswerk** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 1:49 pm

quite a big name even. Maybe it's no wonder about how he got about getting "where" he's at. Not a place i'd want to be in i must say...

brosky · Post by **brosky** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:15 pm

Atheory wrote:all publicity is good publicity?

its not hollywood guys. i think the "producer" involved would probably prefare not to have this sort of publicity.

yes it is , from the start look that in a couple of hours he made 500 people look at this threat and for example if i would listen to that track now and liked it , i would buy it no matter the background of the track , it`s not like his the first one to sample a song with or without a approval, whats the big deal?

jessejames · Post by **jessejames** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:36 pm

Good God, the shuffle thing still hasn't died off yet?

4am · Post by **4am** » Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:48 pm

brosky wrote:
Atheory wrote:all publicity is good publicity?

its not hollywood guys. i think the "producer" involved would probably prefare not to have this sort of publicity.
yes it is , from the start look that in a couple of hours he made 500 people look at this threat and for example if i would listen to that track now and liked it , i would buy it no matter the background of the track , it`s not like his the first one to sample a song with or without a approval, whats the big deal?

i have to agree here: i even listened to a couple of minutes of the track...
having bad publicity is not the worst thing that can happen, if people completely ignore you it is much worse imo
this point is, of course, valid only under certain conditions