exactly.... stories tell... artefacts are material proof... and from what i could see that documentary lacked a lot of material proof and had a lot of stories... i watched the first two episodes and it was laughable at how there was something that was unexplained or had little evidence.. from there they would always jump to the "it must be aliens" conclusions... some of the jumps to conclusions were incredible... It was filmed in such a dramatic american way, sensationalising small bits of information, blowing it way out of proportion whilst at the same time ignoring more potentially logical and rational reasons..john clees wrote:stories can tell but artifacts are material proof.
my favourite one was in the second episode... i think they said something along the lines of...... "it is thought that the pyramids were tombs for their Pharaohs. yet no bodies have been found in the pyramids, even when they were completely sealed so that no grave robbers could have entered... so what were the pyramids used for if not for the dead??"... cut to some "engineering expert" who jumps to the conclusion that the pyramids must have been a space ship power station beaming microwave energy to alien ships in orbit!!!! wtf???
really? come on... there's no bodies in the pyramids so it must be an intergalactic power station for orbiting ancient alien spaceships?? obviously they had their material proof to back this hypothesis up... his reasoning.. no dead body... the air vents that lead to the queens chamber weren't for air, it was in fact channels to pour chemicals (which no artefacts exist for) down so that they mixed in the queens chamber... which reacted and moved up into the kings chamber where there were resonators (which there have been no evidence for either)... the chemical reaction would create microwave energy which shot out the kings chamber air vent into space (because the air vent is point to the sky)... to refuel a spaceship..
