a little Reason theory required

[Luka]

Just wondering if any of you guys could answer my question
im having a little problem with reason and i would like to know why its happening not just an alternative method (but would appretiate as well)

Using Reason 3.0

I am building a pattern using Matrix for Subtractor and want multiple layers. The first is using a resolution of 1/16 with 16 steps. The second is using 1/4 and even though i have it set for 16 steps when i initiate the track it pulls the steps down to 8

alternatively when i start the components without starting the track the step count remains at 16

What is this weird relationship between step count and resolution? It seems an odd quirk

[provaznik]

glitch maybe...

[Unclean]

provaznik: lol, so its positive result :]


Luka: Try to look at sequencer.... maybe you have set A1 on the startup and its always set to default when you start...If you know abou sequencing Matrix, sry .]

[Daniel Logikal]

Luke: Could you please email me at daniel[at]mnml.nl, my PM is stuffed at the moment

[kenada]

having the matrix pulled down to 98 steps... that sounds like you've got a loop set that is shorter than 16 steps at 1/4.

easy solution.

copy first matrix pattern to track for sub. then have matrix connected to sub and add second layer and repeat process until you've built your layers.