steevio wrote:In response to Barem, you misunderstood me, i was just pointing out that our label is already established and we have a steady clientelle who buy our vinyl, so the quality of the music is generally already acceptable. I had already mentioned in a previous post that the quality control of what goes on vinyl and net-label is identical. .
yeah, sure. You´re right! I get your point now.
steevio wrote:
i know that i cant make people give us feedback, that wasnt my point, but i do find it hard to take that we give music away for free, and the people who download it havent got the decency to leave a comment whether negative or positive, surely that is the least that we should expect for our efforts.
I know... that´s why I´m so thankful with the people that take the time to listen and to leave comments of my releases. I´m sure that I would be sad if nobody gives me feedback. But I would never be angry with them, or say that they have no decency, as you can´t do the same when you go to play somewhere for free, maybe to help a friend with his party and only a few people pay attention to your set. In a way, you have to be happy with what you do, and I also understand your position, but if nobody leaves a comment but they pay for the release... is that enough?... I don´t think so...
steevio wrote:
The middle-way i was referring to, was that there is room for both free net-labels, and pay-for ones, which i already pointed out in my previous posts. Freedom of choice ! We also sell mp3's on Kompakt
Remember, I'm running a free net-label, I'm not argueing against them, my question is how long will my artists provide tunes if they get no feedback ?
That´s very hard to know. It depends a lot in their personality. In my case, I would ask myself if I really want to keep making free music whithout thinking about feedback... that would be a very hard desition and I really don´t know what I would do. What I know, is that I wouldn´t be happy only with money. From my point of view, the number of sales has the same meaning as the number of downloads... it´s just a number that gives you and idea of how many people listened to your work.
steevio wrote:
My comment about richie Hawtin, was to illustrate the fact that it is possible to make a living out of this style of music, i didnt say it was posssible to make a living from releases alone, as an underground musician, i am grateful for any money i make in any way, and every little bit helps.
Sure it is! I want to make a living out of this style of music too! and sure that if you get 3 or 4 hundred bucks for a release also helps, but my point is that if you´re not a stablished producer, to give music for free instead of getting those hundred bucks, may help you to become a stablished producer faster and also may help new people to know about our style.
steevio wrote:
I agree with you in that i trust net-labels, new artsists etc, and my flippant comment about the net-label concept being dead, was merely to illustrate the depth of feeling of dissatisfaction felt by my artists and myself at the lack of respect shown by downloaders.
i realise now after two weeks of posting on my first ever forum, that i have to make myself more clear. Maybe i should stick to making music.
I understand your feelings, but as I said before, you cannot blame the downloaders... they take the time to download and listen, and that´s also important...
You have to keep posting, that will help you to get some feedback. Misunderstanding happens very often in forums, as many of us speak different languages and we all have to give our ideas away in just a few paragraphs.
by the way... which is the URL of your net label? I would like to take a listen!