Why don't they come out with the 909, 808 and 303 again (among their other classic machines) ? They would obviously make tons of money as the prices for this gear just goes higher and higher. Most of the sh!t they make is pretty much crap compared to their old gear. Seems like an obvious move to me.
Roland
- Phase Ghost
- mnml maxi
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:19 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, US
- Contact:
You could just get a Acidlab Miami and a x0xb0x.
If it was profitable for Roland to make reissues of analog gear then I'm sure they would. My guess is the manufacturing costs for an 808 would be very high compared with a low parts count digital gear. You would end up with a high cost/low volume product which is not really the way they do business.
I'd keep an eye on Korg though. They seem to be going in the right direction with the monotron ( all analog, released complete schematic).
If it was profitable for Roland to make reissues of analog gear then I'm sure they would. My guess is the manufacturing costs for an 808 would be very high compared with a low parts count digital gear. You would end up with a high cost/low volume product which is not really the way they do business.
I'd keep an eye on Korg though. They seem to be going in the right direction with the monotron ( all analog, released complete schematic).
-
- mnml newbie
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:16 pm
- Location: South of London, UK
- patrick bateman
- mnml maxi
- Posts: 5432
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 10:02 am
- Location: Copenhagen Denmark
- Contact:
I think roland holding their name from those vintage units.
If the new units wont live to their expections, the vintage units will lose their value and so will roland.
dont forget that roland were always producing for the masses. their products were always cheaper and what was the hype.
when most people look for digital "do it all" synth, that what they will make. not an analogue ones.
If the new units wont live to their expections, the vintage units will lose their value and so will roland.
dont forget that roland were always producing for the masses. their products were always cheaper and what was the hype.
when most people look for digital "do it all" synth, that what they will make. not an analogue ones.
This has been discussed before, and the consensus is usually that it would cost too much for Roland to recreate these machines.
However.
With the price of a x0xb0x as low as it is, I can't help but think that if Roland used its superior manufacturing capability, it could easily manufacture a 303 with a couple modern features like MIDI, for $250-300 and sell them for $600-700, easily. I mean, people get x0x kits, put them together, and sell them on ebay for $550-600 and make a profit by doing so...so I don't really buy the argument that Roland couldn't make them for cheaper and still sell them, too.
And considering what an 808 or 909 goes for on ebay--and the price of some of the clones like a Jomox 888--I also don't buy the argument that they couldn't use their mass production capabilities to make a $1000 808 or 909, with a few modern features.
Now whether the market is there or not is debatable. But could they do it for cheaper than what they currently sell for? fck yeah they could.
However.
With the price of a x0xb0x as low as it is, I can't help but think that if Roland used its superior manufacturing capability, it could easily manufacture a 303 with a couple modern features like MIDI, for $250-300 and sell them for $600-700, easily. I mean, people get x0x kits, put them together, and sell them on ebay for $550-600 and make a profit by doing so...so I don't really buy the argument that Roland couldn't make them for cheaper and still sell them, too.
And considering what an 808 or 909 goes for on ebay--and the price of some of the clones like a Jomox 888--I also don't buy the argument that they couldn't use their mass production capabilities to make a $1000 808 or 909, with a few modern features.
Now whether the market is there or not is debatable. But could they do it for cheaper than what they currently sell for? fck yeah they could.
I wondered about this before, the whole concept is arbitrary though I guess. Roland, at that time of releasing said machines couldnt have forseen them becoming future classics and them changing hands for such money. Seems a poor marketing technique to recreate instruments on the back of that. Wasnt at least the 303 a production faliure? Only later did it achieve 'street cred' and got used in a way that wasnt intended. All sorts of variables are possible.
Lets not forget the purists too. I can see a hypothetical situation whereby the purists claim the recreated units do not sound as good as their 'classic' counterparts. Lol
Lets not forget the purists too. I can see a hypothetical situation whereby the purists claim the recreated units do not sound as good as their 'classic' counterparts. Lol