Agents or rep new trend?

pheek · Post by **pheek** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 2:31 am

::BLM:: wrote:Some are useless though. We used a few for remixes and they were really slow.

I'm not sure I understand. You hired agents to get you remixes?

Post by **John Clees** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 4:47 am

pheek wrote: CLICK LINK AND GET CHANCE TO SING THIS AMAZING EP TO YOUR LABELS."

PsyTox · Post by **PsyTox** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:22 am

john clees wrote:
pheek wrote: CLICK LINK AND GET CHANCE TO SING THIS AMAZING EP TO YOUR LABELS."

getting visuals of a dude in Armani suit standing in the office singing a minimal hit, clickpeetpwettuut krrrsjjt krrrsjjt. Bit like those drunk bastards that come to the dj booth to request a track they don't know the title of

tone-def · Post by **tone-def** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 5:40 pm

i can understand having an agent for bookings but for getting tracks signed? i thought there was no money in selling underground music?

is it suppose to be impressive if you have an agent? i don't know about everyone else but i don't like people that can't do simple things for themselves.

::BLM:: · Post by **::BLM::** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 11:46 pm

pheek wrote:
::BLM:: wrote:Some are useless though. We used a few for remixes and they were really slow.
I'm not sure I understand. You hired agents to get you remixes?

no no... we approached artists, they told us to deal with their agent. Only 2 have been like this since 2006 though.