deep dub chord

AK · Post by AK » Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:29 pm

And if you are a reason user too, you can get some cool feedback efx by routing ( say a delay for example ) to a mixer send as normal - but then route the returns to a free mixer channel on the same mixer.

So for example, you could play a synth sound, add the delay by using the channels send knob but then also feed the return channels send into the signal patch. ( be careful though )

tristos · Post by **tristos** » Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:53 pm

+1 for lounge lizard

::BLM:: · Post by **::BLM::** » Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:05 pm

AK wrote:And if you are a reason user too, you can get some cool feedback efx by routing ( say a delay for example ) to a mixer send as normal - but then route the returns to a free mixer channel on the same mixer.

So for example, you could play a synth sound, add the delay by using the channels send knob but then also feed the return channels send into the signal patch. ( be careful though )

Yep I used to do this all the time when using Reason. Reason is great for dubby sounds as the delay unit and syntheizers are really simple. I think the Subtractor would be best for anyone looking to create something dubby or just multimap the piano samples that come with Reason in the NNXT and play some chords with some delay.

One thing that really fucked me off about Reason though is that you cant automate the Advanced Sampler. Why oh why is it like that?

coldfuture · Post by **coldfuture** » Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:52 pm

::BLM:: wrote:
One thing that really fucked me off about Reason though is that you cant automate the Advanced Sampler. Why oh why is it like that?

DEWD, now THAT is no joke. Why the heck did they do that? I mean I am mostly hardware based, but when I do make compy music it is with Reason.

I never got that whole NNXT lack of control thing either...

AK · Post by AK » Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:49 am

victorjohn wrote:
::BLM:: wrote:
One thing that really fucked me off about Reason though is that you cant automate the Advanced Sampler. Why oh why is it like that?
DEWD, now THAT is no joke. Why the heck did they do that? I mean I am mostly hardware based, but when I do make compy music it is with Reason.

I never got that whole NNXT lack of control thing either...

You can assign thing but it's just impossible what you are asking, there's not enough CC numbers to work that.

AK · Post by AK » Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:52 am

Per sample? per zone, different automation? ( if the drop down was automatable! )

You couldn't do it.

Think about it, the knob'X' wanted to move from 12 oclock to 3 oclock, now what the fux the knob gonna do with everything else? it can't move twice and be in 2 places at the same time.

Like I say, not enough CC# man.

hydrogen · Post by **hydrogen** » Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:13 am

AK wrote:Per sample? per zone, different automation? ( if the drop down was automatable! )

You couldn't do it.

Think about it, the knob'X' wanted to move from 12 oclock to 3 oclock, now what the fux the knob gonna do with everything else? it can't move twice and be in 2 places at the same time.

Like I say, not enough CC# man.

yeah but there are other methods to make these modulations and controls... try using the modulation matrix and assigning stuff to the mod wheel or... route some modulation into a CV into the back of the sampler.

Those CV's are reasons best kept secrets.