It might be nice if the LABELS section was split in 2??

Android · Post by **Android** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:22 am

I think it should be split up too

or at least have some better clearly marked [tags]

[V], [D], or [VD] for (Venereal Disease) whoops I meant Vinyl + Digital

beside some negative comments I could make about one format or another

I'll say simply that it could benefit each style of DJ

and make both advertising / crate digging easier for all interested parties.

Post by **John Clees** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:35 am

AVX23 wrote: I think it would start a trend which idiotic people would interpret as - digitally released music is second rate).

I think your completely off base... if you noticed in his initial post it was with a (?) to it as if asking.... this is NOT anyone's belief that I know of - nor would creating different forums imply that. perhaps only self perception from your own experience.

I'm sure this can make it more efficient for both parties (vinyl and digital) gathers to find what they are looking for more effectively.

Post by **John Clees** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:49 am

awww... I see where this started..

ALREADY DONE... PLEASE VOTE and share your thoughts...

we act fast around here...

http://www.mnml.nl/phpBB2/viewforum.php ... 3cfa6ffd79

AVX23 · Post by **AVX23** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:01 am

john clees wrote:
AVX23 wrote: I think it would start a trend which idiotic people would interpret as - digitally released music is second rate).
I think your completely off base... if you noticed in his initial post it was with a (?) to it as if asking.... this is NOT anyone's belief that I know of - nor would creating different forums imply that. perhaps only self perception from your own experience.

I'm sure this can make it more efficient for both parties (vinyl and digital) gathers to find what they are looking for more effectively.

I disagree, (about me being off base) the rest of it - fair comment.

Can't be bothered with nitpicking further - it's a waste of our time, there's good works to be done I'm sure

Coog · Post by **Coog** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Or maybe just for the simple fact of mostly vinyl djs vs. mostly digital djs except most do both, which favors the duplicate argument. hung jury.

lostinmusiq · Post by **lostinmusiq** » Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:12 am

i think befor that it was better ...
now u spend too much time and too much clicks ...

Post by **John Clees** » Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:39 am

AVX23 wrote:
I disagree, (about me being off base) the rest of it - fair comment.

ok your on base - (&) I was expressing a thought... lol

lost.in.musiq wrote:i think befor that it was better ...
now u spend too much time and too much clicks ...

one more click to do research on artists is killing ya... uh... j/king..

it's a niche search vs. spending more time to dig through 100 pages of vinyl release to find what you are looking. Also our search feature isn't the greatest and therefore this would save tons of time to find what you were looking for.

nothing is forever - we can ALWAYS change it back... I though it may be fun to try..

Celltek · Post by **Celltek** » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:39 am

You could also try add a code to the release name in the subject bar like

Digital only realease would be:
DIGITAL[TTT-DIGI-002] Mathias Mesteño - The Casual Opportunist EP
or
DIG[TTT-DIGI-002] Mathias Mesteño - The Casual Opportunist EP

Releases on wax (which also sometimes get released as mp3) would be:

[TTT-DIGI-002] Mathias Mesteño - The Casual Opportunist EP

so no change there..

Just a thought.