[pertin-nce_016] V/A - trial

- free art
Post Reply
bleupulp
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 578
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: lévis
Contact:

[pertin-nce_016] V/A - trial

Post by bleupulp »

Image

cat. number : pertin-nce_016
artist : v/a - (naw, kate carr, hemiptera, bleupulp, ici.eme)
release title : trial
track listing :
1- bleupulp : intro (my life on pause)
2- naw : collecting dust
3- hemiptera : moonaquin
4- bleupulp : erma-doste
5- naw : dust that collects
6- kate carr : slightly better i guess
7- ici.eme : trial-march

sounds like : techno, dub, experimental, ambient

download 192 kps .zip at - www.pertin-nce.com

for .wav. .flac. .vbr. .stream. check here:
http://www.archive.org/details/pertin-nce_016_trial

*photo by JD*
codix
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 3:43 pm

Post by codix »

why do you up the wav files and then the mp3s in so low quality. 320kb/s
would be a better deal and better quality :)

but thx for sharing, the label is great, the music also :)
greatz codix
Drake44444
mnml mmbr
mnml mmbr
Posts: 181
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:46 am
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Post by Drake44444 »

codix wrote:why do you up the wav files and then the mp3s in so low quality. 320kb/s
would be a better deal and better quality :)

but thx for sharing, the label is great, the music also :)
greatz codix

+1 i think so too
bleupulp
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 578
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: lévis
Contact:

Post by bleupulp »

well the 192kps is mostly for bandwidth / space reason
(for the common listeners)

the .wav is for the purist / dj and the L33T . you cant get better quality than the original .wav

but ill keep your opinion in mind.



peace out
codix
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 3:43 pm

Post by codix »

ah ok, i also thaught about the bandwidth issue.
wav for quality issues is very good. i just meaned it for the usual people around in the net.

thx for responding.

greetz 8)
Post Reply