Basslines: digital is not analog
Analogue - slightly overdriven at many times
Digital - pristine
The overdrive adds a bit of harmonic distortion, which many times feels "better". The simple solution for the digital synths that might not sound as nice is to run them through a good sounding overdrive (analog or digital, whatever you like). For me, if I feel that a sound is too clean and sterile, I run it through the mutator/re-201/ms-20/et.c.
My view on this, take it or leave it.
Digital - pristine
The overdrive adds a bit of harmonic distortion, which many times feels "better". The simple solution for the digital synths that might not sound as nice is to run them through a good sounding overdrive (analog or digital, whatever you like). For me, if I feel that a sound is too clean and sterile, I run it through the mutator/re-201/ms-20/et.c.
My view on this, take it or leave it.
I don't believe anyone has really answered your question. True analogue gear(not using a chip to generate sound) sounds so much better because it's built on alague circuts which creates dynamic sounds. Slight voltage changes and other influences especially if the module uses real analogue tubes creates a LOT of slight variations making the sound more organic and I guess alive. The overdrive statement above is also true and analogue saturators and tubes make the sound a lot better then any digital program can.
No matter how much programming you put into emulating analogue gear the variations can be acomplished by using random generations which in analogue gear are not just random... for example, say you have a lightbulb in your room, when someone turns on something in another room it will dim for a split second, the pattern is not random, it will have a peak darker moment, and a fast build up to its normal brightness or maybe a little less bright then normal..... Little changes like that causes electronic components to do that too in analogue gear.
anyways I hope that answers the question.
No matter how much programming you put into emulating analogue gear the variations can be acomplished by using random generations which in analogue gear are not just random... for example, say you have a lightbulb in your room, when someone turns on something in another room it will dim for a split second, the pattern is not random, it will have a peak darker moment, and a fast build up to its normal brightness or maybe a little less bright then normal..... Little changes like that causes electronic components to do that too in analogue gear.
anyways I hope that answers the question.
-
Brian Ffar
- mnml mmbr
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:10 pm
- Contact:
-
clairo
- mnml newbie
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:00 am
- Location: Bibione - Venice - Italy
- Contact:
Probably you do.Ruso wrote:I don't believe anyone has really answered your question. True analogue gear(not using a chip to generate sound) sounds so much better because it's built on alague circuts which creates dynamic sounds. Slight voltage changes and other influences especially if the module uses real analogue tubes creates a LOT of slight variations making the sound more organic and I guess alive. The overdrive statement above is also true and analogue saturators and tubes make the sound a lot better then any digital program can.
No matter how much programming you put into emulating analogue gear the variations can be acomplished by using random generations which in analogue gear are not just random... for example, say you have a lightbulb in your room, when someone turns on something in another room it will dim for a split second, the pattern is not random, it will have a peak darker moment, and a fast build up to its normal brightness or maybe a little less bright then normal..... Little changes like that causes electronic components to do that too in analogue gear.
anyways I hope that answers the question.
Thanks.
Cla.
yea amen aswell but it has nothing to do with the original question nor does it help this topic in any wayBrian Ffar wrote:Amen532nm wrote:analog synth, digital synth, stepping on a duck, i dont care as long as it makes a cool sound.
he was asking a technical question about why even analogue-emulating software does not sound like true analogue hardware.
-
gmschroeder
- mnml newbie
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 4:25 am
I thought I answered it quite well.
Digital stuff is usually designed to sound analog.
It isn't analog.
So, it often sounds like sh!t.
Some people like analog, some like digital. Most rational people think that each sounds better in certain contexts.
As far as a technical answer:
Digital waveforms are made of a large volume of very short analog waves that are then arranged by you/software into shapes sort of like analog waves.
I may be talking out of my butt. Someone correct me if I am.
Here's something that came up by simply typing "analog digital" into google.
http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/question7.htm
Digital stuff is usually designed to sound analog.
It isn't analog.
So, it often sounds like sh!t.
Some people like analog, some like digital. Most rational people think that each sounds better in certain contexts.
As far as a technical answer:
Digital waveforms are made of a large volume of very short analog waves that are then arranged by you/software into shapes sort of like analog waves.
I may be talking out of my butt. Someone correct me if I am.
Here's something that came up by simply typing "analog digital" into google.
http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/question7.htm
