[arpiar001] v/a - dry tool / going like you / de bou (2007)
why ? i bought it ! what was i suppose to do ? wait 4 months for the first romanian release of it's caliber ? curiosity won .whatever wrote:that's nothing to be proud ofvrejulf wrote:i just got the 12" but regarding the digital version
daca ai dry tool de 4 luni inseamna ca l-ai furat....
ps. vrei sa imi spui ca absolut toata muzica ta este cumparata ?
-
patrick bateman
- mnml maxi
- Posts: 5432
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 10:02 am
- Location: Copenhagen Denmark
- Contact:
I was referring to the mp3 you had, even though it's not out digitally.vrejulf wrote:freebase records , where it first came out (i'm refering to the vinyl)patrick bateman wrote:Which 'shop' did you buy 'dry tool' in?vrejulf wrote:i just got the 12" but regarding the digital version
the .mp3beats me , i can't remember where i have it from
-
Thomas D and Jack Thomas
- mnml maxi
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 5:00 am
Not that I approve of stealing or sampling other people's music, but this is nothing new to the industry. The only reason its "rare" in the minimal genre is because there isn't a whole lot to sample.
House music, techno, DNB, it all heavily sampled each other. I can't count the times I've heard people sample Adam Beyer or Jeff Mills blatantly for their tracks. It's pretty disrespectful but nature sorts itself out and those people aren't around anymore.
On the other side of the coin, part of the reason electronic music is around comes from people sampling other sources to create something new and "techno." Taking a disco loop and making a hard techno track, etc. I guess what I am saying is, who has the authority to say "This is okay to sample, but this is not."
This topic has been played to death on forums over the last 10-15 years and there is no real answer. All I know is my personal opinion is that spending the time to make something on your own is 100% worth the wait and effort.
Lastly, I do find it kind of funny that you guys knock these guys so badly for not paying royalties when people like Luciano and Ricardo sample vocals and traditional foreign songs constantly...I'm sure they don't pay royalties out either.
House music, techno, DNB, it all heavily sampled each other. I can't count the times I've heard people sample Adam Beyer or Jeff Mills blatantly for their tracks. It's pretty disrespectful but nature sorts itself out and those people aren't around anymore.
On the other side of the coin, part of the reason electronic music is around comes from people sampling other sources to create something new and "techno." Taking a disco loop and making a hard techno track, etc. I guess what I am saying is, who has the authority to say "This is okay to sample, but this is not."
This topic has been played to death on forums over the last 10-15 years and there is no real answer. All I know is my personal opinion is that spending the time to make something on your own is 100% worth the wait and effort.
Lastly, I do find it kind of funny that you guys knock these guys so badly for not paying royalties when people like Luciano and Ricardo sample vocals and traditional foreign songs constantly...I'm sure they don't pay royalties out either.
Sure...Do you want listen another example?Thomas D and Jack Thomas wrote:Not that I approve of stealing or sampling other people's music, but this is nothing new to the industry.
First listen "Vancouver"
http://www.myspace.com/henrysaiz......And later "What Ever" (Wagon Repair024)
http://mp3.juno.co.uk/MP3/SF266438-01-02-01.mp3Henry Saiz mades "Vancouver" long time ago. And he sends the track to WG, but they didn't want it...
Stole or coincidance?