[arpiar015] ricardo villalobos - empirical house lp
Re: [arpiar015] ricardo villalobos - empirical house lp
samples sound good, improvement on some of the boring sh!t he's been putting out
Re: [arpiar015] ricardo villalobos - empirical house lp
i have to disagree very strongly with the statement from above. ricardo´s stuff is just boring if you don´t listen. anyone who ever produced electronic music himself knows that his productions are on another level...sound wise and from a sonic experience. he has very unique sound which influenced a very wide range of artists from various genres.
To call his productions "sh!t" is blasphemous tbh. especially when i see some of the praises on this forum for the some of the most super straight forward produced mediocre house tunes.
To call his productions "sh!t" is blasphemous tbh. especially when i see some of the praises on this forum for the some of the most super straight forward produced mediocre house tunes.
Re: [arpiar015] ricardo villalobos - empirical house lp
i could say to my friends who don't wanna watch sharunas bartas movies with me that they just don't get him, but i don't cuz i'd sound like a tool.
it's just taste, man.
basically what you've laid out is an extension on the "what right do you have to judge this artist? could you make something better?" argument, which i didn't really think people still used. anyone can have opinions on what he/she likes and dislikes.
also, raising an artist up to the point where to critique him/her is deemed "blasphemy" is somewhat disturbing. he's just a person, and not everything he creates is gonna work.
it's just taste, man.
basically what you've laid out is an extension on the "what right do you have to judge this artist? could you make something better?" argument, which i didn't really think people still used. anyone can have opinions on what he/she likes and dislikes.
also, raising an artist up to the point where to critique him/her is deemed "blasphemy" is somewhat disturbing. he's just a person, and not everything he creates is gonna work.
Re: [arpiar015] ricardo villalobos - empirical house lp
wiwodo finally sees the light of day, although i knew it previously by another name
keep it simple.
Re: [arpiar015] ricardo villalobos - empirical house lp
sry but to me calling something "sh!t" is no valid criticism or expression of an opinion...that is why i have a problem with your comment.pirouette wrote:i could say to my friends who don't wanna watch sharunas bartas movies with me that they just don't get him, but i don't cuz i'd sound like a tool.
it's just taste, man.
basically what you've laid out is an extension on the "what right do you have to judge this artist? could you make something better?" argument, which i didn't really think people still used. anyone can have opinions on what he/she likes and dislikes.
also, raising an artist up to the point where to critique him/her is deemed "blasphemy" is somewhat disturbing. he's just a person, and not everything he creates is gonna work.
i also get that there is personal taste in music involved but there are also objective aspects of music productions and artistic expression which can be somehow measured. music production is a skill and can be judged like one....but calling someones artistic output "sh!t" is straight blasphemy ...no matter who the artist is.
Re: [arpiar015] ricardo villalobos - empirical house lp
yeah...i don't think you understand what "blasphemy" means
-
- mnml newbie
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:55 am
- Contact:
Re: [arpiar015] ricardo villalobos - empirical house lp
Wrong words on both sides.
Re: [arpiar015] ricardo villalobos - empirical house lp
okay when you mean that i was referencing to lobos as a god of electronic music or smth...then you right...probably the wrong words. i didn´t mean that....although his impact is omnipresent....anyway. of course you can criticize his output and point out your opinion. i just think a statement like "boring sh!t" about anyones but especially someones work, which is highly regarded by a lof of people who are interested and involved in the production of electronic music is not really the way to discuss his music or any musical/ artistic output in general in music related forum.pirouette wrote:yeah...i don't think you understand what "blasphemy" means
We could even start to discuss if "boring" is even an opinion...what does boring mean anyway. when you can´t read, a book is probably boring to you...anyway i wasn´t trying to offend you.