: Russell-Jay: Gould. :Quantum-Grammar. &: :FOR THE CLAIM OF THE LIFE.

[John Clees]

No wonder this isn't [shared much]
I'm 100% serious, I'd love to think, (some day), I would be able to actually disqualify other judges!
Well, you, Euros didn't "share this stuff", this is above case law.



PS: From my understanding:

In 1775, Ben Franklin was indeed a British spy, who borrowed 1.5M franks.
* Reviled in the secret vaults of PA

He, specifically, put the US into bankruptcy with the Constitution for APX 70 years afterward.

Fictitious Grammar Contracts
Written with trickery intent:

• SPECIFIC placements written with double “LONG DASHES” which excludes (any/all) things in between, tricking the United States for 70 years afterward.

• Specific placements of “italicized” words also “remove”.

• Specific placements of adverb, adverb, pronoun, etc. – “removes the facts”, in legal “agreements”, which most people weren’t aware of, now, or then.

In 1999, the United States came out of its 3rd Bankruptcy.
* Title 39.101 (Subsection A & Subsection B)

The founding forefathers weren’t there again to sign the constitution, which then expired, which put the flag “open to capture or copyright” aka take over, which the US CORP (wasn’t aware of), and now and has continued to pretend it has the charter to navigate.

Similar, to the old childhood game, (capture the flag), well, that is literally what happened, as there is a new commander in chief (not syn taxed spelling), meanwhile, the US CORP pretended to “take over” the “former United States”, as you ONLY, now see (Yellow Fringe) on the flag, which literally means we are AT WAR with the citizens.


It’s to my deep understanding, our so-called Constitution, which to everyone and everything is the pretend “Cornerstone” of understanding navigation, “to be free”, expired in 1999, using the constitution as a guide, NOT TO Mention — wait for it…
They, themselves, ARE ON & in a birth certificate system.

They don’t have the right to “think or be a fact” either, as (those born “under” a Birth-Certificate) system, are ALL – “LOST AT SEA”, “don’t have the ability to think for ourselves” – aka CORP FICTION.

So, our own birth certificate:
A nurse (just doing her job) STAMPS a baby, (hands & feet), signing a NEWBORN – INTO – a contract, actually, (for us, unwilling), BEFORE a baby physically “hits land”, which – IS the PIVOT point!

This is the GOLD STANDARD, pivot point, of ( H O W ) – we “enter into” a contract before we even are put in a cradle at the hospital

More specifically, pretend “lawmakers”, congress, and fake presidents, don’t have the authority as they claim #1, and #2 they are all, 100% fake actors.

So, their CORP-FICTION birth certificate, which disqualifies “us” from thinking or “being a fact” ALSO, disqualifies them

[John Clees]

How To Use Parse Syntax Grammar To Correct Laws
https://smallchangebigprofits.com/parse ... owers-you/

Parse Syntax Grammar to correct Laws empowers you to identify fraudulent grammar, prove the fraud, and protect your family. Using this technology for any Laws, Statutes, Acts, Rules and Regulations, and Codes is empowering.

As an example of how to use Parse Syntax Grammar, here’s “An Act 1953” when the [ab]Originee flag is recognised by Queen Elizabeth in Australia.

AN ACT 1953

TO DECLARE A CERTAIN FLAG TO BE THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL FLAG.

TO MAKE OTHER PROVISION WITH RESPECT TO FLAGS

Now as you know:

AN = an article …

For an Act…

AN always appears in front of a word that starts with a vowel.

But because they left out “With an act… or … For an act or by an act

They didn’t use the prepositional phrase.

So “AN” now becomes an adverb, not an article in front of the word “ACT”, that means no contract…
Because it’s a vowel and two consonants.

Next, she says: “TO DECLARE…”

Now DE = No, and CLAR = To speak, and “TO” is also a future tense adverb, making DECLARE a “future tense no-speak”.

So she says nothing…

A CERTAIN FLAG now becomes undefined as to what flag she’s referring to, making “CERTAIN FLAG” an adjective-pronoun, calling the FLAG a “No-No”

TO = an adverb in future time, modifying the BE condition of now time.

But now BE is used as a verb, which is an illusion.

Then THE is an adverb making AUSTRALIA to be “a coloring national flag”, so therefore it’s another adjective-adjective-pronoun.

TO1.9 DECLARE2 A1 CERTAIN3 FLAG4 TO1.9 BE2

THE1 AUSTRALIAN3 NATIONAL3 FLAG4.

TO = an adverb in future time, which has no Now-Time jurisdiction, which means you shall never…
MAKE = a verb instead of a “condition of state”

OTHER is a vowel and two consonants, = no-contract word, an adverb, which makes
PROVISION = PRO = No; VIS = Sight; ION = Contract,

Which means you cannot see the flag, and it’s also used as coloring of (pronoun) flag

Dangling Participle Verbs

TO1.9 MAKE2 OTHER1 PROVISION3

WITH = adverb
RESPECT = No-Spectre , comes from “phantom”

So if you have “no phantom condition” in future time,

TO = adverb
FLAGS = a dangling participle verb.

WITH1 RESPECT2 TO1.9 FLAGS2 dpv

You can’t end the sentence with a verb

Yet Queen Elizabeth ends this sentence with a dangling participle verb, and she signs it

Are there any nouns on the page? Or any facts on the page?

Well the answer is NO. There are no prepositional phrases, so there’s no condition of lodial ownership.

And she’s given no Now-Time jurisdiction to anything, so every word has been a condition of future or negative.

So there is absolutely no condition or certification for a Now-Time [ab]Originee flag.

Yet since 1953 for the past 50 years they have pretended to treat the flag as being a national Australian flag

But this is the type of information…does Queen Elizabeth have jurisdiction in Australia.

Well, she claims to be your postmaster. But has the Postal Treaty ever been written with the correct sentence structure communication syntax?

The answer is No

So therefore Queen Elizabeth, as Postmaster, has no treaty whatsoever… Or trust, or contract with the entire country of Australia. She also has no standing in Australia because she’s not an [ab]Originee.

Therefore she’s an illusion that has come here pretending to be something that isn’t because there’s no contract.

And furthermore, when you do the violation on language to fool the people, you’ve lied…As pretending to be a public figure, and then telling lies to the people.

This is perjury.

Which is a criminal act in every language.

Parse Syntax Grammar Declaration

When you use the word declaration you’re saying

“No-Spoken-Contract”

And the throughout the history of mankind, war has always been an issue of trespass and mind control

If I don’t control your mind, I put a bullet or an arrow in it

So that’s basically the fundamental anything that is acquired through war

It’s called “AILING”, which means corruption from the beginning.

Parse Syntax Grammar: Vowel + 2 Consonants

When somebody says; “Show me the law that says a Vowel Plus Two Consonants means ‘No Contract’…”

Well, look up every word in English language and it’ll prove itself. It isn’t where there’s a written law to that effect, it’s just that the word “NO” is a negative condition of state.

Words like “With-Out”, “Under”, UN-, DE-, or AB-; all your prefixes are all negative conditions of state.

If you have anything that is negative you can’t create it, because it’s a negative contract. So if you put the word “NO” in front of any word that’s a fact… then why would you put “NO” in front of a fact?

Parse Syntax Grammar to correct Laws empowers you to identify fraudulent grammar, prove the fraud, and protect your family.

Source-Take-from: https://smallchangebigprofits.com/parse ... owers-you/

[John Clees]

Hot link from above: ["They didn’t use the prepositional phrase."]-https://smallchangebigprofits.com/rules ... structure/

Rules Of Correct Sentence Structure

The rules of correct sentence structure are a closely guarded secret, which is why people get into deep water with the Courts and Legal system, according to DWM.

Jump here to the Parts Of Speech, the Rules of Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Grammar, and the “Numbering System.”

By keeping people in ignorance, Governments and Courts can fleece the people, keeping you in bondage, with debts, banks loans, registration and licence fees, all by your own volition.

And ignorance of the law is no excuse, so by you not knowing about the rules of correct sentence structure, you continue entering in to contracts and sign documents that say nothing.

DWM claims that on 6 April 1988 he finally puts together all the pieces of a mathematical and grammatical puzzle to uncover this secret.

The secret of the rules of correct sentence structure all focus on the parts of speech and order of operations in math and language grammar. This, together with the fact that you make assumptions and presumptions every day, is the key to securing your freedom.

It’s very simple, says DWM. There are ten parts of speech, and around 12,000 words in the English language that most people commonly use.
* Re: DWM (UPDATE 2021: There is conversation, we may have taught incorrect Syntax Grammer, on purpose, TY)/b]

In his over 90,000 hours of study, DWM creates a list of around 700 words for writing contracts and law suits that are water-tight and cannot create any source of argument or dispute.

Freedom And Rules Of Correct Sentence Structure

By following these rules of correct sentence structure, you have power to stop and correct Government departments or agencies, or corporations who are seeking to take money or possessions by force.

DWM claims that without writing sentences using prepositional phrases, all Acts, Statutes, Codes, Rules and Regulations say nothing and have no factual basis. The reason for this is that every sentence contains adverbs, verbs, adjectives and pronouns, yet there are no facts or nouns.

Looking through any large dictionary, you will see that every letter of the alphabet is a noun. Every word, standing alone, is a noun.

When you follow the order of operations, and the rules of correct sentence structure, the positioning of words together changes their definitions. Parts of speech all follow rules.

Without International rules of grammar, there can be no international commerce, because all commerce begins with a contract. Every thing starts with a contract, whether it’s a verbal agreement, or something in writing.

For instance, you go to a coffee shop, and the waiter asks for your order. They make an offer, you accept, there’s an exchange, and that’s a contract.

Or you’re at home, and your child asks you to get a glass of water. There’s an offer, acceptance, and you hand over the glass of water, completing the contract.

In both situations, assumptions are made about the size of the container, the strength of the coffee, and temperature of the liquids.

Word Meanings In Correct Sentence Structure

Relationships of words in a sentence can change their meaning.

You can table a move, and you can move a table. The words, “Table” and “Move” don’t have the same meaning in both instances.

“Table a move” can mean you’re sitting in a board meeting, and someone calls for a vote to move premises, so they “table” the idea of making a move.

“Move a table” is perhaps a little more obvious, where you’re sitting in a café, and a friend joins you for a coffee, so you move one table closer to another table.

“The rabbit is ready to eat,” can mean the rabbit is hungry, and looking for some food. But that sentence can also mean dinner is ready and your host is announcing: “The rabbit is ready to eat!”

Now multiply the effect of such confusion in commercial contracts, and see how easy it is to create arguments that go in front of a judge and jury.

You think if lawyers are really acting in your best interest, they could write contracts avoiding such argument. Maybe they can, but they know there’s more money for them writing in adverb-verb, without using nouns or facts.

DWM tells a story about swapping “secrets” with a judge.
Soon the judge lets it slip that all barristers, lawyers, attorneys and judges live by a “secret code” that states:

“No Law or Fact Shall Be Tried In Court”

And any barrister, lawyer, attorney or judge failing to follow this secret loses their licence to practice law.

Which leads us to parts of speech, and mathematical certification of grammar, proving there are no facts in any Acts, Statutes, Codes, Rules and Regulations.

Parts Of Speech In A Sentence

DWM gives “values” to each of the ten parts of speech, and as you watch closely, you’ll see why.

1. The first one is the “ADVERB”; it modifies adverbs, verbs, adjectives and nouns. Next time you look at any legal sentence, write the number “1” (one) above every “THE”.

Then count the amount of the number “1” you find on one page.

Now if you’re thinking “table” is a noun, then you could be right, because it is an object, a thing. But with the adverb in front of it, the word “THE” modifies table to be a “verb”. Huh??

In law, if you change or modify something, then you’re adding your opinion, which is perjury. So the modification destroys the contract, meaning an adverb is a “no Contract” word.

2. The second of the parts of speech is “VERB”, which we give a value of “2” (two).

Your verb is what causes any action. And before you have any action, you first think about it. Since verb = action-thinking, in Correct Sentence Structure, there are only two verbs:
IS=SINGULAR,
ARE=PLURAL

So when a fact (Noun) changes (because of an adverb in front of it) into a verb, as in “the table”, with criminal volition, it’s a crime, because you create a “Gerund-Noun”, which means a “No – No”.

“No-Contract” Words In Sentence Structure

If your head’s spinning because this seems no[n]sense, while you think about classroom grammar lessons, you’ll love what comes next:

3. Third comes the “ADJECTIVE”, with a value of “3” (three). An adjective is also a modifier, because you use your opinion to describe, in this case, “the table”. If you say “The Red Table”, you’re deciding what colour the table is, where someone else may say the table is a magenta or crimson colour.

So again, when a fact (Noun) changes (because of an adjective in front of it) into a pronoun, as in “the red table”, with criminal volition, it’s a crime. Because you modify the state of the noun, it’s “colouring of the fact” which again breaks the contract. This means every time you introduce an adjective, you create a “No Contract” situation.

4. A Pronoun is an object, a place, or a person. “Table” is a pronoun. But let’s look at the word “pro-no-un”. “PRO” means “No” in any dictionary; “NO” means “No” in any language; and “UN” means “No.” So any word that’s a “pronoun” is a “No-No-No”, and is therefore not a fact.

As you apply the rules of correct sentence structure, you’ll now see how any legal [fiction] document contains no facts, only adverbs, verbs, adjectives and pronouns…

Because grammar rules say that any preposition, without an article or a noun becomes an adverb. And any article without a proposition or a noun, becomes an adverb.

Even though there’s 68 prepositions, and 38 articles in English Language, such as:

At, Am, Because, Before, By, Can, Come, Do, Does, From, He, Her, His, In, Just, Of, Over, It, She, Should, Some, Such, The, They, Their, Then, To, This, Those, Through, Under, etc. those same words can also be adverbs.

Prepositional Phrases In Correct Sentence Structure

So as DWM’s reading through huge volumes of dictionaries looking for the secrets to correct sentence structures, he remembers learning prepositional phrases as a child in an Amish Community school.

Because for a table to be a fact, it needs a position, and a location, otherwise it can be a verb, “table a motion,” in the example above.

5.“Position” or, if you like “Pre-position”, has the value of “5” (five).
The position gives the noun some terms, like the spelling, meaning, rules, and performance-methods.

6. For words commonly thought of as an “Article”, like “The”, or “A’, DWM uses the word “LODIAL”, with a value of 6 (six). The word LODIAL comes from LO=LOCATION, DI=ORIGINAL, AL=CONTRACT. Lodial means “Ownership from the beginning”, original-venue.

So when you have a [pre]position word, then an article word, you have a fact.

7. FACT [NOUN]= no-no, WITH A LINE OVER THE “OWN”=LODIAL

“For my table”, For = 5; my = 6; table = 7;

Now-Time Sentence Structure

You can never live in past time, only in the Now.

Time is always the present, and it is a gift, that we call “present”. Right now, you are reading this… you are not “right now” reading this “yesterday”.

Yesterday does not exist, and nor are you reading this tomorrow, because to-morrow is not here yet.

Since a valid contract must have full [dis]closure, any reference to something that may happen is purely “make-belief”, or “Fiction”. Right this exact second or minute, as you read this, nobody knows for sure what to-morrow will bring, or even if there will be a to-morrow. So how can we agree on an event that may never happen?

8. PAST-TIME. Since past time comes before future time, “Past Time Tense” has the value of 8 (eight). Past time is not real, because it is not happening right this very second.

9. Future time comes after past time, so “Future Time” has the value of 9 (nine).

10. CONJUNCTION is the last of these parts of speech, has a value of zero (0), because it gives a choice. There are only two conjunctions, AND =COMMAND, DUTY; and OR=OPTION, CHOICE, EITHER.

5 – 6 – 7 Rules Correct Sentences

In math, to check the accuracy of a calculation, you read the equation start to finish, and then you start at the finish and work through to the front, as in

2 + 3 = 5 || 5 – 3 = 2.

It’s with this logic that DWM opens the secret key to correct sentence structure, reading start to finish, and then finish to start, as in:

“For the bridge is OVER the river”, and “For the river is UNDER the bridge”, where OVER and UNDER are the opposite prepositions.

Here you have “position-article-noun – VERB (IS or ARE) – position-article-noun.”

Notice also, the sentence structure using the values above: 5-6-7 – 2 – 5–6-7 and taking the prepositional phrase (5-6-7) left to right is 5-6-7-2-5-6-7, and right to left is 5-6-7-2-5-6-7.

In both cases, the Now-Time claims are equal, and there are no adverbs, adjectives or pronouns mixing with the claim or causing any fraudulent parse syntax grammar.

With every sentence in DWM’s book, website, Contracts or Law suits, he follows the same pattern and rules of correct sentence structure, as follows:

FOR …….. ………………. [5-6-7]
OF …….. ………………. [5-6-7]

IS / ARE [2]

WITH …….. ……………….[5-6-7]
OF …….. ……………….[5-6-7]
WITH…….. ………………. [5-6-7]
OF …….. ……………….[5-6-7]
WITH …….. ……………….[5-6-7]
BY…….. ……………….. [5-6-7]

Frontwards: “For the positions in the now-Time-Tense with the same-plane ARE with the correct-positions-both-ways by an authority.”

And backwards: “For the authority of the correct-positions-both-ways ARE with the same-plane in the now-Time-Tense by the positions.”

Words not to use include “TO” and “From”, because you can never be charged in the future, and nor from the past beyond your birth-time.

DWM claims that when you apply this knowledge, you have power to stop and correct any Government departments, agencies, or corporations who are seeking to take money or possessions by force.

With this technology you write contracts and law suits that are water-tight, stopping lawyers and judges in their tracks and admitting to their fraud. And there’s no wriggle room to create any source of argument or dispute, when you follow the correct order of operations and these rules of correct sentence structure.

[John Clees]

See those [--] - double long dashes, it's [supposed] to exclude everything in between, however, it also proves intent, and voids their pretend contract(s) - Durp.

[John Clees]

Please note this is to share for information purposes, there are FAKE people collecting money, even a FAKE outfit calling themselves, "THE PURPLE SHIELD" or some nonsense with a CURSIVE SIGNATURE, which cursive, IS - the language of the DEAD.

Also, meaning - I don't "support" the above link for a paying service, just sharing the grammar trickery, source, and content here.

Vowel + 2 X Consonants = NO
Offer + Acceptance = Contract. And when you look closely at language, you’ll see how many words change through manipulation and modification. What if you discover that O+FF = “No”? The claim that any word starting with a vowel, followed by two consonants means “NO”, does seem a little far-fetched. IMP-ossible!

Bet they don’t tell you that in School!

You can check this out yourself, by physically picking up a dictionary and looking at every word starting with a vowel, followed by two consonants.

Searching through online dictionaries does not give the same outcome, because it’s harder to see the patterns online.

Keep looking, and you will discover that every word that starts with vowels, A, E, I, O, U, followed by two consonants means “NO”

For example, “Potent” means “physically powerful; having great authority”.

When you add the prefix “IM-“ you have the word “Impotent” which means “powerless to act or accomplish anything”

Same with “Im-possible”, which is defined as the opposite of “Possible”

Offer + Acceptance = Contract
Everything revolves around contracts. When you prove that language is as accurate as a Math problem, you can identify the lies and fraud in legal documents.

It is a condition of state that exists on every Contract, and everything in the world revolves around Contracts.

You offer to make breakfast for your family, they accept, so you then go ahead and make breakfast. You and your family entered into a verbal contract.

I offer + You accept = Contract. CONTRACT is the most important thing in the world of commerce. Everything is about contracts.

On your way to work, you call in at the local cafe, and ask for a cup of coffee. The barista offers to make you a coffee, you agree on the price, and the coffee is served, Offer + Acceptance = Contract.

With knowledge of mathematical interface of language you can write Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Grammar-Performance (C.-S.-S.-C.-P.-S.-G.-P.) documents to prove language as accurate as a math problem.

With syntax you can show people what is Wrong and Right.

This technology has power at the highest levels of Government all around the world. Once you learn it, you have the power to stop and correct any-one try-ing to manipulate you.

The Bible says: “Know the truth, and the truth will set you free”… WRONG! – TRUTH is nothing more than an Opinion.

“Correct-Ness” Sets You Free, Not “Truth”.
When you can correct Syntax, you own your freedom.

By knowing the order of operations, you can stop and correct every word that begins with a vowel. Replace negative words using synonyms, with the correct syntax word.

Remember: When you’re looking to be CORRECT, you cannot point the finger at anyone else, by making a claim that they did something.

What you CAN claim is this: You can claim that you are being damaged by negligence.

There’s a difference.

Knowledge Comes First
Only when you have First-Hand-Knowledge of a situation or event, can you then go and investigate whether or not there is a case for negligence. And when you discover the facts, then you should report that negligence.

Without that first-hand knowledge, you cannot claim to be a witness of the events that are taking place.

When you look closely at language, you’ll see how many words change through manipulation and modification.

Even something so simple as “today” was written as two words (to-day) less than one hundred years ago, and to-morrow as another way of saying ‘on the morrow’.

By learning the mathematical interface to correct the language you’ll be able to replace all the missing facts (nouns) to gain the correct message being communicated.

When Contract-Writers and/or legislators use a negative word, followed by a comma to isolate the meaning, you have to dissect it. With this process of syntax, you’ll discover that it’s not just ONE-word. You’ll see it’s an entire paragraph, spelled out, if you can read beyond the language that’s used.

We live in a world where every-body is making assumptions and presumptions every-day, and colouring the “FACTS” with personal opinion.

You might hear someone say:

“She thinks she can take a packet of biscuits”.

How do you know what she thinks? Even if you’re a witness to her taking the biscuits, you have no idea what thoughts are going through her head, unless she tells you. No one else but her knows what she thinks.

Presumptions And Assumptions In Contract
You make presumptions and assumptions all-day, every-day, especially in contracts.

And making presumptions and assumptions gets you into trouble every day.

Because you don’t know what you don’t know until you do know that you don’t know.

So now you know.

“Have the knowledge and power to have all your words, especially in contracts or any legal documentation, inarguably correct!” — DWM

Remember this: Everything in the world revolves around contracts, and few people know that we’re slaves of English Grammar. And even less people are taking the time and effort to learn how to change their situation to become free from that tyranny.

Instead, they sit back and complain and whinge about paying fines, penalties, infringements etc.

What are you waiting for?

Now’s the time to start the journey to free yourself from the slavery of English Grammar, by making the first step and reading rules of correct sentence structure here

And we’ll get back to you quicker than a kid raiding the cookie jar.

https://smallchangebigprofits.com/offer ... contracts/

(s) https://smallchangebigprofits.com/parse ... owers-you/

[John Clees]

Personally, the only source I'd trust.
In the end, its about maneuvering contracts, not "being in the know", and there are ways to do it, but also many sources to attempt to slowly bring our world into a place of Facts & Love.


https://linktr.ee/RussellJayGould
https://www.fortheclaimofthelife.com/


FOR THE CLAIM OF THE LIFE.
https://www.fortheclaimofthelife.com/f- ... q-post-706

: [Dis]qualifi[ed]-Global-[Or]ganizations.

Chief disqualified the Geneva Convention and MANY OTHER ORGANIZATIONS, therefore we cannot accept ID cards as identification and no associations with these organizations for your claim will be made.

: GLOBAL-DIS-QUALIFICATIONS.
: Dis-Qualifications.
: TITLE: 18: DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-CLAIM-SECTION: 1001: Fictitious-Grammar AS THE QUALIFICATION-FOUNDATION WITH THE FOLLOWING-FOREIGN-POSTAL-CORPORATIONS AS THE VOID-AUTHORIZATION-CORPORATIONS &: PLOYEES:

CDC=UNITED STATES CENTRAL DISEASE AND CONTROL
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
FEMA AS THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
INTERPOL
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATION
INTERNATIONAL BANK OF SETTLEMENTS
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION
INTERNATIONAL BUREAU OF WEIGHTS & MEASURES
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE COURT AT THE HAGUE
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION
INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MICROSOFT
NASA
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COURT-~NEW-YORK
THE WHITE HOUSE
EACH STOCK MARKET OF THE PLANET-EARTH
UNITED NATIONS
UNIVERSAL POSTAL UNION
U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
UNITED STATES SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES FEDERAL REGISTER
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
US TREASURY
US NAVY
US MARINE CORPS
US AIR FORCE
US COAST GUARD
US CUSTOMS
US SENATE
US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
UNITED STATES SPECIAL FORCES
UNITED STATES PRESIDENCY-ENDED-1999
UNITED STATES FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER
EACH STATE ELECTIONS COMMISSIONS AND ELECTIONS LAWS/GUIDELINES
WHO=WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
WORLD BANK
VATICAN CITY

For the Chief-suspend of the Geneva-Convention &: Many-World-Corporations.

For this purpose of these performances ARE with the void-joinder of the I.-D.-cards-grant with the identification-usury of these corporations by the Chief: Russell-Jay: Gould.

Chief disqualified the Geneva Convention and MANY OTHER ORGANIZATIONS, therefore we cannot accept ID cards as identification, and no associations with these organizations for your Claim-contract will be honored.

[Re]gister[ed]-Mailing-Form-Number-~3806.
: [Re]gister[ed]-Mailings.
: [Re]gister[ed]-Number-[De]finition?
: [Re]newing-Drivers-License & of the Passport.
: [Re]sponse-time for my [e]mails?
: [Re]tirement & with the [Dis]ability-Questions.
: [United-Kingdom]-Mailings.
: [Up]loading-Files-Failure.
: $1-Stamp & with the Whole-Number-Stamps.
: Anna-Von-Reitz & of the Kim: Goguen-closure.

: Authorize[d]-Syntax-Grammar-Teachers & Websites:

: NOW-SPACE.
: CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR-PERFORMANCE=C.-S.-S.-C.-P.-S.-G.-P.
: Russell-Jay: Gould.

: Authorize[d]-Grammar-Teachers &: Websites:

: Monte-Edwin: Mueller. [USA]
[QuantumCommunity[at]protonmail.com]

: John-Angus: Lowdnes. [CANADA]
[syntax-man1[at]protonmail.com]

: Muriel-Meta: Biggs. [CANADA]
[SyntaxLearningCenter.com]

: Joey-Jon: Lester. [USA]
[SyntaxLearningCenter.com]

: Mark-Vincent: Merkowsky, [CANADA]
[ariuspiso[at]gmail.com]

: Bradley-Gordon: Johnson. [CANADA]
[quirious007[at]yahoo.ca]

: Paul-Douglas: Jubenville. [CANADA]
ForTheSupport[at]ForTheAumstead.com

: Maury-William: Shapka. [CANADA]
mshapka[at]yahoo.com

: Alem: Ljuca: [AUSTRALIA]
: ROOKIE-STATUS: Teaching-Syntax-Level-One.
[Syntax-Patriot[at]outlook.com]

ForTheClaimoftheLife.com-Website-Mentor. For the New-Claimants-Aid with the Mechanics.
Alem: Ljuca: [AUSTRALIA]
[Syntax-Patriot[at]outlook.com]



: Instagram.com/russelljaygouldnow.
: Linktr:ee/RussellJayGould.
BITCHUTE-TBD

Twitter-NO TWITTER ACCOUNT. Beware of fraud accounts.

: PIRATES & FAKE-TEACHERS: https://fortheclaimofthelife.com/helpie ... -teachers/

: Birth-Certificate-Closure.
: Birth-Certificate-System-Bank-Note.
: Can-I, send-Birth-Certificate, if, void-English?
: Can, I-change-my-name-post: Claim of the life?
: CAPITALIZATION of the Name.
: Cargo of the Thinking.
: Children/Child-Claim of the Life-treaty.
: Credit-Score.
: DNA-BIO-Data.
: Do-you, have-translations in other Foreign-Languages on this website?
: Drivers-License.
: Dual-Citizenship.
: Fake-Teachers &: : Fiction-Websites.
: Felony-Charge.
: Flag on the Claim?
: Flag, The Australian-Flag.
: Form-~3806-U-S-A.
: Free-System?
: How-long is for my-[a]ccount-[a]ctive?
: LIVE-LIFE.
: Mailing-Length-Time?
: Making of the Claim-Copies, Certifi[ed].
: Making-Stamp-Copy?
: Moving &: Changing-Location.
: Name-Change.
: Native-[A]merica[n].
: Need-Help?
: One-Claim-[ac]count-per-claimant?
: Parent-Middle-Names.
: Passport.
: Pen &: [In]k Color.
: Punctuation with the Post-Office.
: Purchase-Complete? Now-What?
: Save-me.
: Security of My-Data.
: Sending in the Actual-Documents Or: Just-Photocopies? [Submitting Claim of the Life identification]
: Ships-Papers &: Sea-Pass.
: Signature-Versus-Autograph.
: Sovereign-Citizen.
: Spell-Checking-My-Punctuation?
: Stamp-$1-Value, Onli.
: Stamp-Caution.
: Stamping-Vessel-Contracts?
: VESSEL.
: Void-[Re]Funds.
: Witness of the Claim of the Life.
: Writing-Mechanics-SAMPLE for your [E]mail-Signature.
: Writing-Mechanics-SAMPLE for your Mail-Location.
[With the Claim of the Life we become a corporation. Why would one want to be a corporate fact?]
~$1-stamp[AUSTRALIA].
For the Claim of the Life-treaty.
For the what is the Method on the Corporation-Creation? [For my company]
For the what type of the Birth-Certificate-valid?
For the why-use-Paypal? : Paying with the Gold/Silver, Ok?
IS for the Claim of the Life with my Country, O-K?

[John Clees]

: USA-MILITARY-MEDICAL-CONTRACT:


FOR THE CLAIM OF THE LIFE.
https://www.fortheclaimofthelife.com/us ... -soldiers/

: USA-MILITARY-MEDICAL-CONTRACT:
: [AC]TIVE-USA-MILITARY, SPOUSES, FAMILY-MEMBERS & FORMER-MILITARY.
~1: Complete your Claim of the Life-purchase. (: Fee for the freight as the toll fee).
~1-b: Login & Complete-form of the Step-Two-Claim of the Life (with two IDs).
~2: [E]mail with your Name & Military-card here: help@fortheclaimofthelife.com. [Subject-Line: Military-Contract]
~3: Wait on the speedy-service-correspondence-back & military-contract–filing-structions of the next-steps with the 180-day-grace-period.

: CAPIAS-WARRANT-CONTRACT: FORMER-USA-MILITARY & [AC]TIVE-MILITARY.
~1: Complete your Claim of the Life-purchase. (: Fee for the freight as the toll fee).
~1-b: Login & Complete-form of the Step-Two-Claim of the Life (with two IDs).
~2: [E]mail with your Name & Title & Military-Badge or: Former-Badge: help@fortheclaimofthelife.com. [Subject-Line: CAPIAS-WARRANT]
~3: Wait on the speedy-service-correspondence-back & CAPIAS-CONTRACT-FILING-STRUCTIONS of the next-steps with the 180-day-grace-period.

[John Clees]

Quick update:

: Russell-Jay: Gould. Wrote the code within the United States Federal Government.

There are things ON OTHER CHANNELS, that could help, but also confuse, or be invalid.
In the end, this is about navigating all areas of life, if you choose to walk through this path.

Meaning, people have tried to a.) Attempt to copy Quantum Grammar principles, (copying Russell) and even "offering Claim of the Life" which are NOT VALID, and b.) Even charge money for such things, which is why they now have to "be approved", as they should be.

BE CAREFUL of impostors, there will be a messy maze; as this is highly sensitive information, which can/does/will change the world.

Also, Purple thumbprint WITH CURSIVE are FRAUDS; ONLY seek those "Authorized Life of the Claim off of Russell's site.