What in the World Are They Spraying? (Full Length)

[John Clees]

old topic naturally but interesting point of view so I thought i'd share. I didn't know about the link to alzheimers as well. I'd love to start seeing medical graphs of spikes, as I'm sure it's the same thing happened in the 80's when they made aspartame (fake sugar). I once saw a documentary on how diabetes spiked something close to 60% the next few years after that was put on the market. illusion of choice as always.

What in the World Are They Spraying? (Full Length)



"incidents of Alzheimer's has sky rocketed & alzheimer's has been linked to aluminum in the brain"

goal : "dependent on companies that sell gmo seeds"

"geoengineering is in part weather modification"

- treating the earth like a physic's lab...

[Themis]

dont believe in graphs and statistics if you cant validate the rawdata and interpret the numbers yourself

all this theories start and depend on you just believing these numbers.

also i read something funny yesterday

all the 9/11 conspiracy theories depend on "jetfuel cant melt steal beams"
who says there was only jetfuel on the airplane? maybe the terrorists hijacked a plane with a new chemical on board that was ready to be sprayed. and maybe this chemical can melt steal beams

[John Clees]

if you cant validate the rawdata and interpret the numbers yourself

meaning I should personally interview the millions of american that got diabetes before I take it as truth?

also, some random getting something that is more specific than the US military..

ok.... must of bought it on ebay i'm sure...

[Themis]

if you cant validate the rawdata and interpret the numbers yourself

meaning I should personally interview the millions of american that got diabetes before I take it as truth?

no you dont have to do the interviews, that part is often made without manipulation.

but interpreting the data after the interview and drawing conclusions, thats where people get creative.

usually you read: diabetes rate 3 times higher than 1995.
but it is nowhere mentioned that they lowered the threshold value for diabetes since 1995 two times, also the newspapers dont say what they even took for a treshold value to draw this conclusion.

if i say the treshold value for diabetes is 90 mg/dl bloodsugar, then i can declare more than half the population sick of diabetes. if i say the treshold value is 120 its only 30 percent ..

the raw data (interviews, surveys, research) are mostly accurate.

but from raw data i could draw the wildest conclusions.

there is this saying

The only statistics you can trust are those you falsified yourself

[John Clees]

"lowered the threshold value"