music 2.0

oblioblioblio · Post by **oblioblioblio** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:52 am

i think he's talking sense.

PsyTox · Post by **PsyTox** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:26 am

some things make sense, some seem more like rambling. Money isn't important, but at the same time he likes fabric because they pay him more if more people come for him. Wait, isn't that how it already works?

I do like the fact that he's doing a lot of charity first hand, but just do that and don't go rambling about bad greedy bastards blahblah. These greedy bastards make the money that you can use to help others. So use the system to do some good, and don't talk about it, just act. Period. Music 2.0 sounds like the 70ies and 80ies hippie version of communism

junger · Post by **junger** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:00 am

its quite funny... on the one hand he says that he wants to find a new word for charity, because that word could somehow be offensive and in the same breath he vomiting on the whole scene.....

still i respect his effort of just doing something that actually is sensefull.

ChrisCV · Post by **ChrisCV** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:45 pm

PsyTox wrote:Music 2.0 sounds like the 70ies and 80ies hippie version of communism

pretty much... i don't think its the music at all... i think jay haze just wants to live in a communist/socialist utopia using music as a cover...

no wonder he moved to lima, he would have been burnt on the cross in the US republicans along with Obama apparently a socialist hitler...

::BLM:: · Post by **::BLM::** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:50 pm

people lap it up though. they are blinded by him doing the charity thing I guess and cant see the bigger picture.

I still cant get over how he is saying the big players are getting rich, when this is him as far as i can see. How many of us can just decide to move to another part of the world? He has the money to do it because of music for sure, so why is now hating on everyone else that wants to do the same thing?

Themis · Post by **Themis** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:39 pm

i think everyone can move to lima, its like 3rd world there.. just get a job there, and even that should not be a problem at all with the school education from the west..

nothing easier than moving to south america i guess ..

try it the other way and move from south america to europe, now thats impossible.

::BLM:: · Post by **::BLM::** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:01 pm

I bet more south americans move to europe then us moving there. I have loads of mates from south america.

do you think jay is working in a bar or something to keep living? I bet he is living off the money he earnt from gigs. Its his lifestyle that has alllowed him to go there and do the things he is doing. i'm not knocking him for that, its just he now seems to be telling everyone else that this is not ok to charge large fees etc.. when he im sure at some point he has been paid large amounts of money to dj or do a remix or something.

jay haze · Post by **jay haze** » Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:36 pm

Themis wrote:i think everyone can move to lima, its like 3rd world there.. just get a job there, and even that should not be a problem at all with the school education from the west..

nothing easier than moving to south america i guess ..

try it the other way and move from south america to europe, now thats impossible.

you literally have no clue what you are talking about.
South American cities are more expensive than most American cities, and on par with some European cities. ever been here?
i have been living in South America for on and off 6 years, not only in Lima.
in Lima, i have 0 American friends or European for that matter.
go see for yourself before you make ignorant remarks, which is clearly what your remark is.

@ BLM- i get it, you are frustrated. you dont know me personally, or what i do on a day to day basis. i have NEVER in my life charged a large fee for anything, and i simply get by. i am happy to simply get by, and have good people around me who help to support my "unpopular" beliefs.
i mean really, present some evidence before u run a muck.

you people can say all you want about me, but in the end its just speculation until you have proof. when you get proof of me being anything near to what i stand against, then please present the evidence.
until then, just talk about the facts.
as long as you do that, i can do nothing against it.
i am not pissing on anyone, or saying anything negative in this interview. nor am i turning my back on ANYONE. i invite everyone who wishes to see some change happen to get involved.

@patrick bateman- this idea of music 2.0 i state very clearly, "for lack of a better term" this is not my idea, many people are involved and i dont claim to have all the answers. just many quesions.

my question to anyone on this board who has negative sentiment about this interview- what is soo wrong about asking questions?
what is soo wrong about dreaming of a world where things are in proportion.

please stop talking as if any of you know me, its exactly whats wrong with the media in general.
a 2 page interview doesnt even begin to explain all the ideas i have, and how much time has been spent on thinking of them.

you can ask me anything, so go ahead! im here- never been too far away.