See, this is an attitude i like more no, jokes aside, sorry for the argument, like i said earlier it was probably a matter of not understanding well what the other meant, had the conversation happened in person im sure it would have been different!

Cheers

You don't get it don't you? Ok i will try to explain it again. Sure, a yes or no answer is not really what i wanted. Opuswerk posted an interesting vid, and then expanded with an helpful answer. Same AK, which has everytime a friendly attitude here in every topic to which he answer to. Then you came...

If you have a busy bassline, avoid having too much decay on your kick. You just don't need it if the bass is providing all the low end. A long 808 kick and sustained bass notes is going to cause issues. Not saying that's what you're doing but I'm just stating the obvious... :) Yeah usually i like m...

Thanks for the clarification :) aniway , here the problem is not me not knowing what sampling rate is. I know. But the question was different: i don't have to do any analog to digital conversion, so i was wondering if a higher sampling rate would increase the quality of bounced synths . It appears i...

It depends what card you have, some are ok and don't cause issues, some suck. I've done a test with dpc latency checker on my laptop and my adapter cause a lot of latency. When i start woring on a project everything works correctly, as soon i start stacking vsts the system start glitching and i have...

Using a firewall isn't going to do anything to him.. The problem is that he has to deactivate the wireless card because it causes latency issues in ableton or other music softwares i think (hence the glitches). So even if he use a firewall to allow only ableton, he's going to have glitches because o...

If i wanted the wikipedia explanation i could have googled myself ;) wikipedia it's good and all but if you don't know about a subject it's sometimes difficult to comprehend fully the text. For example: "The sampling rate, sample rate, or sampling frequency (f_s) defines the number of samples p...

Thanks that's the answer i was looking for! I suppose i will use 96000 from now on!