we have over come the problems of Amplification and Tuning why perpetuate such poor standards? why regress ? we dont live in caves anymore for a reason Subtlety in dynamics comes to mind. I personally like more than 127 nondiscrete values for an uncountable number of parameters in my music, along w...

Everyone who isn't designing and building their own analog or FM synthesizers is sampling - you have a fixed, if very large, set of sounds that you modify, in a limited, if very large, number of ways.
Get over it.

What the hell's wrong with your real name?

This discusses major labels, rock music, and is very old, but gives a picture of why you're better off going on your own.

All the promotion and production is designed to benefit itself, not you.

http://www.negativland.com/albini.html

So is it the pitched perc that goes virtually all the way through the first track on there?

Not my thing, but I don't see where it's utterly unlistenable . . .

pheek wrote:

jessejames wrote:#1 - that track was released over 2.5 years ago
#2 - don't think that's the sound Pheek's on about

#3 - topic is dead, let's move on please

thanks! i agree.

This comes off snotty.

I still don't know what the hell we're talking about.
Oh well.

Someone tries to understand what you're talking about, you give them snobbery.

If you're so great, why are you running a netlabel?

Oh, I got it now. Yeah. Gross. Ironic, really, that something so useless to a song's danceability would end up in "minimal" music. For those of you who are still confused . . . Look up Berg Nixon on beatport. "Box Escape" is the record, "The Depths" is the track. It's j...