i have this habit

[orphic]

Ofcourse a miminal set will still peak, it's just of a different scope.

I would draw a graph but I really cbf

[harass]

Ofcourse a miminal set will still peak, it's just of a different scope.

I would draw a graph but I really cbf

Of course, but the word has connotations to a traditional layered buildup peak.. I just wouldn't use the word peak, to decribe a minimal climax.

(PS: and were just going to ignore the word 'techno and it's connotations)

[orphic]

But a climax still has a peak

[harass]

But a climax still has a peak

A climax is a peak.

I’m just discussing the connotation of ‘peaking’, not the definition.

[daniel lyons]

But a climax still has a peak

A climax is a peak.

I’m just discussing the connotation of ‘peaking’, not the definition.

i was talking about the defination...

peak (for me) - at the point where the set is at its maximum development

- daniel

[harass]

i was talking about the defination...

i know, i was being a smart ass

at the point where the set is at its maximum development

that's the way it's muscially defined, but you can have a emotional climax at anytime, no?.. I wonder what sparks that reaction.

*edit: I've been reading a bit of musical theory, they define a climax as the point of most intensity, which I feel is a little more correct.. Manly because it can explain why there can be a climax without maximum point of development - intensity can be developed more dynamically.*

[wes_mcgee]

maximum development or maximum intensity?

[orphic]

I think Harass is just pulling sh!t out of his arse



Just kidding love