are cdj400's any good?????

jesusfish · Post by **jesusfish** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:27 am

have you already ruled out going with/staying with vinyl??

Dragonsand · Post by **Dragonsand** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:28 am

I've tried it and it's good.

And I agree with clees.

Don't believe the hype too much, even my numark axis 2 (very very basic) does a great job so....

kristofason · Post by **kristofason** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:56 pm

shoulda said yes to those DNS-1200 + the Technics 1210 with the brand new ortofon concord + the Gemini 4 channel USB mixer + the Sony amp for £800 ono...

can't believe we let that one go mate! coulda sold the deck alone for £300!!!

p.s make me a cuppa

NoAffiliation · Post by **NoAffiliation** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:01 pm

most cd players are more than fine for mixing, just make sure you get one with .02% pitch resolution... to my knowledge the cdj800 is the only pioneer model that does not support this

LouisVee · Post by **LouisVee** » Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:52 pm

I own a 800 and a 400.

The 400 is cool but... I prefer the feeling/touch on the 800. In my opinion, you should decide between a 200 if you wanna save some money or a 800 for better quality.

infernal.techno · Post by **infernal.techno** » Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:20 am

LouisVee wrote:I own a 800 and a 400.

The 400 is cool but... I prefer the feeling/touch on the 800. In my opinion, you should decide between a 200 if you wanna save some money or a 800 for better quality.

yeah I like the 800s as well as the 1000s...the cd platter works great and i love the looping features.

the 400 is ok like john said for the price. if you are buying a 400, you aren't in the market for anything more expensive.

stantons, technics and denons are crap..i haven't played on a numark so i cannot comment. the other 3 seem cheap and break easily

pioneer is going to be the best for your money...and it's good b/c they have different price ranges