haha, thats true indeed.AK wrote:it's impossible for example, for the xbase to be better than the 808 at being an 808.
but i dont think someone said that.
haha, thats true indeed.AK wrote:it's impossible for example, for the xbase to be better than the 808 at being an 808.
i don't know, gotta ask themAK wrote:Better in what way?Rein wrote:i thought that ricardo said his jomox xbase sounds better than the 808, and after an a b comparison, they agreed that the jomox sounds better indeed.
important infoblizt wrote:" the 808—without EQing and without compression—sounds perfect"
What else matters? I'd rather have something that sounds in a club rather than something that sounds good in Ricardo's studio.steevio wrote:important infoblizt wrote:" the 808—without EQing and without compression—sounds perfect"
I don't know about anyone else but that sounds pretty good to me. How can that be a negative?blizt wrote:
it sounds kind of fat and unbelievably loud and full of sound.
Think that came from the jomox website, they list him as having the xbase 999 but it doesn't necessarily mean he uses it in his productions.blizt wrote:don't know where all that jomox comes from but not from this interview.